Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 18;11(7):1300–1318. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2019.1632114

Table 3.

Performance of various aggregation prediction methods on the SnAggR set.a

Prediction Methodsb R2 c ρc Area under ROC curved
Structure-based
SAP 0.23 0.48 0.77
DI (Fitted) 0.25 0.50 0.86
CamSol Structure Corrected 0.25 0.49 0.81
AGGRESCAN3D Static 0.00 0.03 0.56
AGGRESCAN3D Dynamic
0.03
0.06
0.55
Sequence-based
CamSol 0.29 0.54 0.82
AGGRESCAN 0.21 0.49 0.80
TANGO 0.35 0.44 0.82
Waltz 0.00 0.01 0.46
PASTA 0.05 0.25 0.68

a Raw data given in Table S5.

b See Methods section for details.

c Squared Pearson correlation coefficients and Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients are based on dimer LogKd(μM) data determined by analytical ultracentrifugation and listed in Table 2 and Table S5.

d Area under ROC curve (see also Figure 7(b)) values are based on dimer % data determined by analytical ultracentrifugation and listed in Table 2 and Table S5.