Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 13;111(9):952–960. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy220

Table 2.

Net risk of iIBC in DCIS patients without locoregional treatment, based on SEER (1992–2014)*

Risk measure All (n = 1286) Tumor grade
ER status
Tumor size
Age at diagnosis
Nonhigh (n = 547) High Positive Negative ≤1 cm >1 cm <55 y ≥55 y
(n = 244) (n = 407) (n = 64) (n = 266) (n = 187) (n = 463) (n = 823)
Net risk of iIBC, % (95% CI)
 5 y 7.3 6.7 10.0 6.5 10.7 5.1 10.7 8.7 6.5
(5.8 to 9.1) (4.6 to 9.8) (6.4 to 15.3) (4.1 to 10.2) (4.5 to 24.3) (2.8 to 9.1) (6.3 to 18.0) (6.2 to 12.0) (4.8 to 8.7)
 10 y 12.1 12.2 17.6 NA NA 10.9 14.2 13.6 11.3
(10.0 to 14.7) (8.6 to 17.1) (12.1 to 25.2) (6.8 to 17.3) (8.4 to 23.4) (10.2 to 18.0) (8.6 to 14.7)
 15 y 14.0 NA NA NA NA 12.5 NA 15.2 NA
(11.4 to 17.2) (7.8 to 19.8) (11.4 to 20.3)
Cox Proportional Hazard Models
 Univariate HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Ref) 1.56 1.00 (Ref) 1.65 1.00 (Ref) 1.67 0.99†
(0.96 to 2.55) (0.67 to 4.06) (0.88 to 3.17) (0.98 to 1.01)
 Multivariat HR (95% CI) 1.00 (Ref) 1.44 1.00 (Ref) 1.40 1.00 (Ref) 1.62 0.99†
(0.87 to 2.37) (0.56 to 3.50) (0.84 to 3.10) (0.98 to 1.01)
*

For risk estimates and HRs in patients with unknown tumor features, see Supplementary Table 1 (available online). CI = confidence interval; DCIS = ductal carcinoma in situ; HR = hazard ratio; iIBC = ipsilateral invasive breast cancer; NA = estimates not reported when less than 10% of initial patients remain at risk; Ref = reference factor; SEER = US National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program.

Age as continuous variable (years) in Cox models.