Fawzy 2018.
| Methods |
Study design: randomised controlled trial Study grouping: parallel group |
|
| Participants |
Baseline characteristics 36.5°C
37.0°C (control group)
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
| Interventions |
Intervention characteristics 36.5°C 37.0°C (control group) |
|
| Outcomes |
Clinical outcomes Primary outcome
Secondary outcome
Embryological outcomes: rates of blastocyst formation, high‐quality blastocysts, high‐quality cleavage‐stage embryos on day 3 and fertilisation |
|
| Notes | They reported no study funding or competing interests NCT01706900 |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Randomisation was achieved using a random allocation sequence generator by an Excel random number table (Microsoft, Redmond, WA)." |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "The randomisation results were allocated in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, which were stored in the secretary's office until the day of HCG trigger." |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "Participants and clinicians were blinded to the allocation to 36.5 degrees Celsius or 37.0 degrees Celsius culture temperature and remained blinded at transfer. Albeit the embryology team had always access to the culture protocols and was not blinded." |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Judgement comment: objective outcome |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Judgement comment: intention‐to‐treat analysis was performed |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Judgement comment: full‐text reports on outcomes stated in clinicaltrials.gov. |
| Other bias | Low risk | No annotations |