Table 3.
Assessment of the Random forest classifiers.
Classifier | Biomarker NO. | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | Precision | F1 score | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group H vs Group O | 13 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.68 |
Group H vs Group OA | 47 | 0.70 | 0.53 | 0.80 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.76 |
Group H vs Group O1 | 23 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.77 |
Group H vs Group O2 | 17 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.76 |
Group H vs Group O3 | 11 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.46 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
Group H vs Group O1-2 | 10 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.74 |
Group H vs Group O2-3 | 20 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
Group O vs Group OA | 24 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.57 |
Group O vs Group O1 | 44 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.35 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.61 |
Group O vs Group O2 | 15 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.65 |
Group O vs Group O3 | 19 | 0.64 | 0.80 | 0.32 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.63 |
Group O vs Group O1-2 | 19 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.46 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.59 |
Group O vs Group O2-3 | 42 | 0.71 | 0.90 | 0.27 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.66 |