Table 1.

Description of studies included in the meta-analysis (N = 14).

References	N patient group	N healthy controls	Mean age patients	Mean age controls	Type of analysis	Type of task	Task modality	Software	Magnetic field strength	Smoothing (FWHM)	TR
Bedford et al. (42)	11	8	39.0	31.0	WB	Trait judgement	Visual - W	XBAM	1.5	8	2,000
Blackwood et al. (35)	8	8	38.0	36.0	WB	Statement judgement	Visual - W	SPM99	1.5	10	3,000
Holt et al. (36)	18	17	35.9	40.0	WB	Trait judgement	Visual - W	SPM2	3	6	3,000
Jimenez et al. (43)	20	16	48.3	44.7	WB	Trait judgement	Visual - W	FSL	3	5	2,500
Liu et al. (5)	15	15	50.0	40.5	WB	Self-referential task	Visual - W	SPM	3	6	1,500
Makowski et al. (44)	15	15	33.1	35.2	WB	Social approval task	Visual - W	SPM8	3	8	2,000
Menon et al. (37)	14	15	40.5	35.9	WB and ROI	Statement judgement	Visual - W	SPM5	1.5	8	2,300
Murphy et al. (45)	11	10	26.7	29.6	WB	Trait judgement	Visual - W	SPM2	4	6	2,000
Park et al. (46)	14	15	29.5	28.2	WB	Self-referential task	Visual - V	AFNI	1.5	8	3,000
Pauly et al. (39)	13	13	36.2	34.5	WB	Trait judgement	Visual - W	SPM5	3	8	2,400
Sapara et al. (38)	26	16	34.5	31.8	WB	Self-monitoring	Auditory	SPM	1.5	10	3,250
Shad et al. (47)	17	15	40.0	44.3	WB	Self-awareness	Visual - W	SPM5	3	8	2,000
Tan et al. (48)	18	17	40.5	41.2	WB	Trait judgement	Visual - W	SPM8	2	8	3,000
van der Meer et al. (40)	47	21	34.3	30.0	WB	Statement judgement	Visual - W	SPM2	3	10	2,000

WB, whole brain; ROI, region-of-interest. Task modality: visual (visual stimuli, usually words—W or videos—V, presented on the screen), auditory (auditory stimuli, usually speech, presented binaurally).