Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 30;19(17):3760. doi: 10.3390/s19173760

Table 1.

Comparison of Sensitivity Characteristics of Humidity Sensors.

Materials Measure Range Sensitivity Response/Recovery Time Temperature Mass/Thickness of Coated Film
SAW with PVA Film 16–72.8%RH 89.34 kHz/%RH -/- 20 °C -/910 nm
Patterned on the Reflectors [59]
SAW with PVA Film 15–59.1%RH 23.09 kHz/%RH -/- 20 °C -/865 nm
Opened at IDT   Pads [59]
Nanoflower TiO2-shaped QCM [60] 0–97%RH 15.3 Hz/%RH 9 s/3 s (At 97%RH) 20 °C 11827 ng/1–4 μm
Nanosphere TiO2-shaped QCM [60] 0–97%RH 18.9 Hz/%RH 6 s/3 s (At 97%RH) 20 °C 11801 ng/1–3 μm
Hollow Ball-like TiO2-coated QCM [60] 0–97%RH 33.8 Hz/%RH 5 s/2 s (At 97%RH) 20 °C 11676 ng/300 nm
PDDAC /GO, Film-based QCM [61] 0–97%RH 25.4 Hz/%RH 7 s/3 s (At 97%RH) 25 °C 5518 ng/-
Acidized-MWCNTs -coated QCM [62] 11–95%RH 221.4 HZ/%RH 49 s/6 s (At 95%RH) 25 °C 21114 ng/-