Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2019 Aug 22;24(17):3046. doi: 10.3390/molecules24173046

Next Generation Sequencing-Based Transcriptome Predicts Bevacizumab Efficacy in Combination with Temozolomide in Glioblastoma

Alimu Adilijiang 1, Masaki Hirano 1, Yusuke Okuno 2, Kosuke Aoki 1, Fumiharu Ohka 1, Sachi Maeda 1, Kuniaki Tanahashi 1, Kazuya Motomura 1, Hiroyuki Shimizu 1, Junya Yamaguchi 1, Toshihiko Wakabayashi 1, Atsushi Natsume 1,*
Editors: Miyoshi Daisuke, Akio Ojida, Kazuhito Tabata
PMCID: PMC6749405  PMID: 31443404

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and malignant brain tumor, is classified according to its isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status in the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) brain tumor classification scheme. The standard treatment for GBM is maximal resection, radiotherapy, and Temozolomide (TMZ). Recently, Bevacizumab (Bev) has been added to basic therapy for newly diagnosed GBM, and monotherapy for recurrent GBM. However, the effect of IDH1 mutation on the combination of Bev and TMZ is unknown. In this study, we performed transcriptomic analysis by RNA sequencing with next generation sequencing (NGS), a newly developed powerful method that enables the quantification of the expression level of genome-wide genes. Extracellular matrix and immune cell migration genes were mainly upregulated whereas cell cycle genes were downregulated in IDH1-mutant U87 cells but not in IDH1-wildtype U87 cells after adding Bev to TMZ. In vitro and in vivo studies were conducted for further investigations to verify these results, and the addition of Bev to TMZ showed a significant antitumor effect only in the IDH1-mutant GBM xenograft model. Further studies of gene expression profiling in IDH1 mutation gliomas using NGS will provide more genetic information and will lead to new treatments for this refractory disease.

Keywords: glioblastoma, IDH1 mutation, RNA-seq, NGS, GSEA, GO analysis, U87 cell line, temozolomide, bevacizumab

1. Introduction

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and malignant brain tumor and has an extremely poor prognosis. The overall survival time (OS) of most GBM patients is less than five years after diagnosis. Even with the standard treatment of maximal resection, radiotherapy (60 Gy), and Temozolomide (TMZ, an alkylating agent), the median survival time is reported to be approximately 15 months, with less than 10% of patients surviving beyond five years [1,2,3]. Due to the development of next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, genetic analysis for GBM has progressed rapidly in recent years. The most noteworthy development was the discovery of the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene abnormality in 2008. Comprehensive genetic analysis of GBM by Parsons et al. revealed that patients with the IDH1 mutation in GBM had a better prognosis than those without the IDH1 mutation [4]. According to its clinical course, GBM can either be classified as primary GBM, which initially develops as GBM, and secondary GBM, which malignantly transforms from a lower grade glioma (LGG). In addition, it has been revealed that the IDH mutation is predominantly observed in secondary GBM and LGG [5]; thus, it is thought to be the earliest genetic event in glioma genesis [6]. Since the IDH mutation was recognized as an important brain tumor molecular marker, the World Health Organization revised its brain tumor classification in 2016, with GBM classified according to its IDH mutation status [7]. However, it remains to be elucidated which genetic alterations are involved in the malignant transformation of LGGs into secondary GBM.

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) with NGS is a newly developed powerful method that enables the quantification of the expression level of genome-wide genes. Compared with DNA microarray, which has been widely used to evaluate the expression of a wide range of genes, RNA-seq does not require previously prepared probes, thus enabling the evaluation of unknown gene expression and the identification of unknown fusion genes or various alternative splicing. Moreover, without the risk of non-specific hybridization, it can also evaluate the expression level of transcripts of very low abundance.

In this study, we performed transcriptomic analysis by NGS and revealed that the inhibition of the vascular microenvironment played important roles in tumor growth in the IDH1-mutant GBM xenograft. Regarding the vascular microenvironment in GBM, there has been emerging evidence [8,9,10,11,12,13]; as GBM is known to secrete vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and actively induce angiogenesis, Bevacizumab (Bev; an anti-VEGF humanized monoclonal antibody) has recently been used to treat GBM. Although Bev monotherapy for recurrent GBM has significantly increased the OS of patients [14,15,16], large-scale clinical trials (AVAglio trial; RTOG0825 trial) of newly-diagnosed GBM demonstrated that Bev in combination with standard treatment significantly prolonged progression free survival (PFS), but not OS [17,18]. However, no large-scale clinical trials or comprehensive results on the combined use of Bev and TMZ have been reported with regard to the IDH1-mutant GBM; therefore, the effect of IDH1 mutations on these therapies is unknown.

2. Results

2.1. Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals Different RNA Expression of Genes Related to Immune Response and Cell Cycle in IDH1-Mutant Glioblastoma Cells but not in IDH1-Wildtype Cells after Adding Bevacizumab to Temozolomide

For two decades, DNA microarrays have been widely used to examine gene expression; however, RNA-seq, a newly developed method of NGS, has recently been replacing DNA microarrays. DNA microarrays have several disadvantages compared to RNA-seq, since they can only identify pre-defined sequences and non-specific hybridization can occur. In other words, RNA-seq can evaluate the expression levels of unknown genes and transcripts present in low abundance. Although sequencing data from NGS is enormous and more difficult to interpret, many methods of NGS data analysis have been developed. The workflow of RNA-seq data analysis used in this study is summarized in Figure 1. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) are powerful analytical methods that assign functional terms to each gene or make various functional gene sets and calculate the statistical significance of gene sets of interest. They enable us to understand the function of genes whose expression level changed significantly after therapeutic intervention. In this study, RNA-seq revealed highly different genome-wide expression profiles in IDH1-mutant U87 and IDH1-wildtype U87 cells treated with TMZ + Bev (Figure S1). To investigate the effects of adding Bev to TMZ in those two types of cells, GO analysis and GSEA were performed. GO suggested that Bev + TMZ upregulated genes for extracellular matrix organization and immune response, but downregulated genes for cell cycle progression in IDH1-mutant U87 cells (Figure 2). Similarly, GSEA suggested that the combination of Bev and TMZ activated genes related to immunocyte migration (myeloid leukocyte migration, leukocyte chemotaxis, and lymphocyte migration/ chemotaxis), but suppressed genes related to the cell cycle (DNA replication, mitotic recombination, chromosome condensation, and DNA strand elongation) in IDH1-mutant U87 cells (Figure 3). The expression level of genes for immunocyte migration or the cell cycle was significantly different in IDH1-mutant U87 cells after adding Bev to TMZ (p = 1.68 × 10−13, p < 2.20 × 10−22 by Wilcoxon rank sum test, respectively; Figure 4), whereas there were no significant changes in IDH1-wildtype U87 cells (p = 0.3, p = 0.08 by Wilcoxon rank sum test, respectively; Figure 4). To verify these results, we performed further investigations in vitro and in vivo.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The workflow of RNA-seq and data analysis used in this study. Next Generation Sequencing reads sequenced with the Illumina Hiseq 2500 were aligned to the hg19 genome + transcriptome assembly (UCSC hg19) using TopHat v2.1.1 with the default parameters. Read counts of each gene were obtained using HTSeq and differential expression was analyzed using DESeq. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) were performed to interpret the results.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Gene Ontology analysis. (a) Addition of Bevacizumab (Bev) to Temozolomide (TMZ) upregulated genes for extracellular matrix organization and immune response in IDH1-mutant U87 cells. (b) Addition of Bev to TMZ downregulated genes for cell cycle progression in IDH1-mutant U87 cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) suggested that the combination of Bevacizumab and Temozolomide activated genes related to immunocyte migration (myeloid leukocyte migration, leukocyte chemotaxis, and lymphocyte migration/ chemotaxis), but suppressed genes related to the cell cycle (DNA replication, mitotic recombination, chromosome condensation, and DNA strand elongation) in IDH1-mutant U87 cells.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Heatmaps of upregulated genes (left) and downregulated genes (right) in IDH1-mutant U87 cells after adding Bevacizumab to Temozolomide. Although the expression level of genes for immunocyte migration or the cell cycle significantly changed in IDH1-mutant U87 cells, it showed no significant change in IDH1-wildtype U87 cells.

2.2. Bevacizumab Has no Additive Effect with Temozolomide on IDH1-Wildtype and IDH1-Mutant Glioblastoma Cells

In order to investigate the antitumor effect of Bev, TMZ, and Bev + TMZ in vitro, they were administered to IDH1-wildtype and IDH1-mutant U87 cells and the numbers of living cells were examined using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays. Cells treated with 0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were used as a control. As shown in Figure 5, there was no significant difference in the number of living cells in the Bev monotherapy group compared to the control group in either the IDH1-wildtype or IDH1-mutant U87 cells. When TMZ was administered, cell viability was markedly suppressed in both cells, and when treated with Bev and TMZ in combination, cell growth was remarkably suppressed in both cell lines; however, there was no significant difference between TMZ alone and Bev + TMZ.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

The viability of IDH1-wildtype U87 cells and IDH1-mutant U87 cells was assessed after treatment with Temozolomide (TMZ) and/or Bevacizumab (Bev). Although TMZ showed a significant antitumor effect, the addition of Bev to TMZ showed no significant add-on effect in both cell lines. *p < 0.05; n.s., not significant.

2.3. Bevacizumab in Combination with Temozolomide Suppresses IDH1-Mutant Glioblastoma Xenograft

RNA-seq revealed that the addition of Bev upregulated microenvironment-related genes, including those for the extracellular matrix organization and immune response in IDH1-mutant GBM cells. This result agreed with the fact that there was no significant difference between IDH1-wiltype and IDH1-mutant U87 cells in vitro. Next, we investigated whether the combination of Bev and TMZ would significantly affect tumor growth in an animal model. Notably, TMZ + Bev suppressed tumor growth only in the IDH1-mutant U87 xenograft, whereas neither TMZ nor Bev monotherapy inhibited tumor growth in either cell type and IDH1-wiltype tumors did not respond to Bev + TMZ (Figure 6). These results did not contradict those of RNA-seq followed by GO and GSEA analyses.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Tumor volume changes in mice xenograft models. A significant antitumor effect was observed only after Temozolomide + Bevacizumab treatment in the IDH1-mutant U87 xenograft model, whereas no antitumor effect was observed in the IDH1-wiltype U87 xenograft model.

3. Discussion

According to one of the largest reports of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), GBM with IDH mutation accounts for only a small percent of all gliomas [19]. Consequently, there has only been a few reports on specific gene expression profiling of IDH1-mutant GBM in comparison with that of the IDH1-wildtype GBM, although the IDH1 mutation in glioma has been found to cause extensive DNA hypermethylation (glioma CpG island methylator phenotype, G-CIMP) leading to the suppression of gene expression [20]. Some studies focusing on a limited number of genes have showed that IDH1-mutant glioma tends to display a lower expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), a smaller number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) [21], and a lower expression of genes related to CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and IFN-γ [22] than those of the IDH1-wildtype counterparts. Further in-depth studies on the effect of IDH1 mutation in glioma on gene expression profiling might help to develop new therapeutic strategies for the lethal disease.

There have been some studies that have reported the effects of Bev monotherapy on cancer cells. Ramezani et al. reported that Bev resulted in apoptosis induction in parallel with the upregulation of p53, and a significant decrease in the levels of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation on glioblastoma cancer stem-like cells in vitro [23]. ERK phosphorylation activates genes that induce cell cycle entry and suppresses negative regulators of the cell cycle, ultimately promoting cell growth and proliferation [24,25]. Additionally, Bev induces A549 (an adenocarcinoma cell line) cell apoptosis through the mechanism of endoplasmic reticulum stress [26]. In this study, we generated a human GBM cell line transduced with the mutant IDH1 gene (IDH1-mutant U87), evaluated the difference in sensitivity to currently available chemotherapy for GBM (TMZ and Bev) between the IDH1-mutant and IDH1-wildtype types, and investigated the underlying mechanism with a high-precision comprehensive analysis using RNA-seq.

IDH1 is a cytosolic enzyme that uses NADP to oxidize citrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), which generates NADPH2 [27]. IDH2 is located in the mitochondria, but catalyzes a similar reaction. IDH3 is a part of the tricarboxylic acid cycle in the mitochondria, where NADH2 is oxidized to NAD+ in the respiratory electron transport chain to produce ATP [28,29]. While the reactions catalyzed by IDH1 and IDH2 do not yield energy, the oxidation of NADH2 generated by IDH3 reaction results in the production of three ATP molecules.

The IDH1 mutation has been reported to be a novel driver mutation of gliomas [30]. It has been counterintuitive for a driver mutation as IDH1-mutated gliomas showed a favorable OS, in contrast to IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia with a poor prognosis [31]. The IDH1 mutation results in the production of considerable amounts of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). The IDH1 mutation must be present in a mutated/wildtype heterozygous allele to produce 2-HG [32]. Once citric acid is converted into isocitrate, the wildtype IDH1 enzyme converts isocitrate into α-KG via the intermediate oxalosuccinate. As this reaction constitutes oxidation, it requires NADP, which in turn is reduced to NADPH2. During the oxidation reaction, CO2 is produced. In contrast to the forward reaction, the reverse reaction is a reductive carboxylation, where CO2 is covalently fixed on α-KG. In turn, the mutant allele converts α-KG into 2-HG, and requires NADPH2 as a reduction equivalent. Thus, the generation of NADPH2 by cytosolic IDH1 is impaired when IDH1 is mutated. The accumulation of 2-HG inhibits ten-eleven translocation (TET) and lysine (K)-specific demethylase (KDM) with DNA and histone demethylation activities [33,34]. The deactivation of TET and KDM leads to the accumulation of aberrant DNA and histone (such as H3K9me3 and H3K27me2) methylation [20]. Moreover, a high concentration of 2-HG is also known to inhibit α-KG-dependent dioxygenases, procollagen-proline 4-dioxygenase [35], and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) [36]. This evidence is consistent with the present study result, that is, the expression of extracellular matrix- and vascular endothelial cell-related genes was dramatically changed in IDH1-mutant GBM cells after adding Bev to TMZ.

In summary, by RNA-seq with NGS, we found that when Bev was added to TMZ in IDH1-mutant U87 cells, the expression of genes for the extracellular matrix and immune cell migration was increased, whereas that for cell cycle progression was decreased. Interestingly, there were no such variations in IDH1-wildtype U87 cells. In support of these results, TMZ + Bev showed an antitumor effect only in the IDH1-mutant GBM xenograft model in vivo. In this study, a high-precision comprehensive analysis by RNA-seq investigated the underlying mechanism of Bev efficacy to IDH1-mutant GBM. Further studies of gene expression profiling in IDH1 mutation gliomas using NGS will provide more genetic information and will lead to new treatments for this refractory disease.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture

The human GBM cell line U87 was transduced to express endogenous wildtype IDH1 or the mutant IDH1-R132H (kindly provided from Dr. R. Pieper, University of California at San Francisco). The cell culture medium used was high glucose (4500 mg/L) Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich, Co., St, Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (PS; Gibco® by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), hereafter referred to as DMEM. The IDH1-wildtype U87 and IDH1-mutant U87 cell lines were cultured in DMEM in an incubator with a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C containing 5% CO2.

4.2. Therapeutic Agents In Vitro

TMZ (Sigma-Aldrich, Co., St, Louis, MO, USA) stock solution was dissolved in DMSO at 100 mM, and the final concentration of all reagents was adjusted by DMEM. There were four treatment groups for each cell line: Bev (provided from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan after the material transfer agreement) 500 ng/mL in DMSO (0.5%); TMZ 97 µg/mL in DMSO (0.5%); and Bev 500 ng/mL + TMZ 97 µg/mL in DMSO (0.5%), and DMSO (0.5%) as the control group. Hanif et al. reported that IC50 growth inhibitory effect of TMZ alone on U87 GBM cells was 0.45 mM [37], thus we used 97 µg/mL (approximately equal to 0.5 mM) of TMZ in vitro. Based on the article by Mesti et al. [38], we determined the concentration of Bev in vitro to be 500 ng/mL.

4.3. Therapeutic Agents In Vivo

Five-week-old nude mice were subcutaneously injected with 5 × 106 cells of the IDH1-wildtype U87 or IDH1-mutant U87 cell line respectively, to prepare a subcutaneous tumor model. According to the report of Zhang et al. [39], 10 mg/kg Bev was used for our animal experiments. Previously, in the U87 xenograft model, TMZ therapeutic effects were obtained at the concentrations of 5–10 mg/kg/day [40,41]. According to these reports, we chose a TMZ dose of 7.5 mg/kg/day for 5 days. When the tumor diameter reached 5 mm, 10 mg/kg of Bev, 7.5 mg/kg of TMZ, a combination of 10 mg/kg of Bev and 7.5 mg/kg of TMZ, or DMSO (control) were administered intraperitoneally. The same amount of TMZ was intraperitoneally administered for five consecutive days. After the administration of these reagents, the tumor volume of each treatment group was measured every day.

4.4. Cell Viability with Cell Counting Kit-8 Assay

The IDH1-wildtype U87 and IDH1-mutant U87 cell lines were seeded at a density of 2500 cells/well in 96-well plates and cultured for 24 h with 100 µL DMEM in an incubator. The medium was then aspirated and they were treated for 120 h with their respective therapeutic agents and 100 µL DMEM in an incubator. Each treatment group used 12 wells in a 96-well plate for each cell line and 8 wells in each plate contained 100 µL DMEM without cells. At 0 and 120 h after treatment, 10 µL CCK-8 (Dojindo Molecular Technologies Inc. Kumamoto, Japan) solution was added to each well and incubated for 3 h in an incubator. Absorbance was measured using a microplate reader ARVO X4 (PerkinElmer, Inc. Waltham, MA, USA) at 450 nm. Comparative analysis was performed between the groups without the highest and lowest two measured values in each treatment group, except for the average value of the cell-free wells.

4.5. Therapeutic Agent Treatment for Next Generation RNA Sequencing

The IDH1-wildtype U87 and IDH1-mutant U87 cell lines were seeded at a density of 2.0 × 104 cells/well in 24-well plates with 500 µL DMEM and incubated for 24 h in an incubator. They were then treated for 120 h with their respective therapeutic agents and 500 µL DMEM in an incubator, and the total RNA was isolated from each treatment group.

4.6. Sample Preparation for RNA Sequencing

A RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen Corporation, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract RNA from the IDH1-wildtype U87 and IDH1-mutant U87 cells. The quality and quantity of the RNA was evaluated using a Qubit4 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). In this study, all RNA Integrity Number (RIN) scores were > 8.5. cDNA libraries for paired-end sequencing on the Hiseq 2500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) were prepared using a NEBNext Ultra RNA library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) with the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module.

4.7. RNA Sequence Processing

NGS reads sequenced with the Illumina Hiseq 2500 were aligned to the hg19 genome + transcriptome assembly (UCSC hg19) using TopHat v2.1.1 with the default parameters. Read counts of each gene were obtained using HTSeq [42] and differential expression was analyzed using DESeq [43]. GSEA was performed using the GSEA JAVA program (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea). GO analysis of genes whose expression level changed significantly (p < 0.05) by more than two-fold after adding Bev to TMZ in IDH1-mutant U87 cells was performed using http://metascape.org/.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

The cell viability and chemo-sensitivity data were analyzed by a Student’s t-test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

In IDH1-mutant U87 cells, the expression of genes for the extracellular matrix and immune cell migration increased, whereas that of cell cycle progression decreased after the addition of Bev to TMZ. Interestingly, there were no such variations in the IDH1-wildtype U87 cells. In support of these results, TMZ + Bev showed an antitumor effect only in the IDH1-mutant U87 xenograft model in vivo. A high-precision comprehensive analysis by RNA-seq investigated the underlying mechanism of Bev efficacy to IDH1-mutant GBM. Further studies of gene expression profiling in IDH1 mutation gliomas using NGS will provide more genetic information and will lead to new treatments for this refractory disease.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Takashi Yamamoto for his technical support.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Figure S1: Heatmaps of whole-genome genes in IDH1-wildtype U87 cells and IDH1-mutant U87 cells after treatment with TMZ and/or Bev. Caption: The expression profiles of the genome-wide genes highly differed in IDH1-wildtype U87 cells (left) and IDH1-mutant U87 cells (right) after treatment with TMZ and/or Bev.

Click here for additional data file. (516.3KB, zip)

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.N.; methodology, H.S. and J.Y.; software, S.M.; validation, K.A. and Y.O.; formal analysis, M.H. and K.A.; investigation, A.A. and M.H.; resources, Y.O. and K.T.; data curation, M.H. and Y.O.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A., M.H.; writing—review and editing, A.N.; visualization, K.M. supervision, F.O.; project administration, T.W.; funding acquisition, A.N.

Funding

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Chemistry for Multimolecular Crowding Biosystems” (JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 17928985).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Ask the corresponding author (A.N.) for sample availability.

References

  • 1.Ostrom Q.T., Gittleman H., Farah P., Ondracek A., Chen Y., Wolinsky Y., Stroup N.E., Kruchko C., Barnholtz-Sloan J.S. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2006–2010. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15:ii1–ii56. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stupp R., Mason W.P., van den Bent M.J., Weller M., Fisher B., Taphoorn M.J., Belanger K., Brandes A.A., Marosi C., Bogdahn U., et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:987–996. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stupp R., Hegi M.E., Mason W.P., van den Bent M.J., Taphoorn M.J., Janzer R.C., Ludwin S.K., Allgeier A., Fisher B., Belanger K., et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:459–466. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parsons D.W., Jones S., Zhang X., Lin J.C., Leary R.J., Angenendt P., Mankoo P., Carter H., Siu I.M., Gallia G.L., et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321:1807–1812. doi: 10.1126/science.1164382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yan H., Parsons D.W., Jin G., McLendon R., Rasheed B.A., Yuan W., Kos I., Batinic-Haberle I., Jones S., Riggins G.J., et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:765–773. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Suzuki H., Aoki K., Chiba K., Sato Y., Shiozawa Y., Shiraishi Y., Shimamura T., Niida A., Motomura K., Ohka F. Mutational landscape and clonal architecture in grade II and III gliomas. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:458–468. doi: 10.1038/ng.3273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Louis D.N., Perry A., Reifenberger G., von Deimling A., Figarella-Branger D., Cavenee W.K., Ohgaki H., Wiestler O.D., Kleihues P., Ellison D.W. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Plate K.H., Breier G., Weich H.A., Risau W. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a potential tumour angiogenesis factor in human gliomas in vivo. Nature. 1992;359:845–848. doi: 10.1038/359845a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goldman C.K., Kim J., Wong W.L., King V., Brock T., Gillespie G.Y. Epidermal growth factor stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor production by human malignant glioma cells: A model of glioblastoma multiforme pathophysiology. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1993;4:121–133. doi: 10.1091/mbc.4.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheng S.Y., Huang H.J., Nagane M., Ji X.D., Wang D., Shih C.C., Arap W., Huang C.M., Cavenee W.K. Suppression of glioblastoma angiogenicity and tumorigenicity by inhibition of endogenous expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:8502–8507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oka N., Soeda A., Inagaki A., Onodera M., Maruyama H., Hara A., Kunisada T., Mori H., Iwama T. VEGF promotes tumorigenesis and angiogenesis of human glioblastoma stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007;360:553–559. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.06.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jhaveri N., Chen T.C., Hofman F.M. Tumor vasculature and glioma stem cells: Contributions to glioma progression. Cancer Lett. 2016;380:545–551. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Treps L., Perret R., Edmond S., Ricard D., Gavard J. Glioblastoma stem-like cells secrete the pro-angiogenic VEGF-A factor in extracellular vesicles. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2017;6:1359479. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2017.1359479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cohen M.H., Shen Y.L., Keegan P., Pazdur R. FDA drug approval summary: Bevacizumab (Avastin) as treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Oncologist. 2009;14:1131–1138. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chamberlain M.C., Johnston S.K. Salvage therapy with single agent bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. J. Neurooncol. 2010;96:259–269. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9957-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kaloshi G., Brace G., Rroji A., Bushati T., Roci E., Hoxha M., Fejzo G., Petrela M. Bevacizumab alone at 5 mg/kg in an every-3-week schedule for patients with recurrent glioblastomas: A single center experience. Tumori. 2013;99:601–603. doi: 10.1177/030089161309900507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chinot O.L., Wick W., Mason W., Henriksson R., Saran F., Nishikawa R., Carpentier A.F., Hoang-Xuan K., Kavan P., Cernea D., et al. Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:709–722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gilbert M.R., Dignam J.J., Armstrong T.S., Wefel J.S., Blumenthal D.T., Vogelbaum M.A., Colman H., Chakravarti A., Pugh S., Won M., et al. A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:699–708. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ceccarelli M., Barthel F.P., Malta T.M., Sabedot T.S., Salama S.R., Murray B.A., Morozova O., Newton Y., Radenbaugh A., Pagnotta S.M., et al. Molecular profiling reveals biologically discrete subsets and pathways of progression in diffuse glioma. Cell. 2016;164:550–563. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Turcan S., Rohle D., Goenka A., Walsh L.A., Fang F., Yilmaz E., Campos C., Fabius A.W., Lu C., Ward P.S., et al. IDH1 mutation is sufficient to establish the glioma hypermethylator phenotype. Nature. 2012;483:479–483. doi: 10.1038/nature10866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Berghoff A.S., Kiesel B., Widhalm G., Wilhelm D., Rajky O., Kurscheid S., Kresl P., Wohrer A., Marosi C., Hegi M.E., et al. Correlation of immune phenotype with IDH mutation in diffuse glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19:1460–1468. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kohanbash G., Carrera D.A., Shrivastav S., Ahn B.J., Jahan N., Mazor T., Chheda Z.S., Downey K.M., Watchmaker P.B., Beppler C., et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations suppress STAT1 and CD8+ T cell accumulation in gliomas. J. Clin. Invest. 2017;127:1425–1437. doi: 10.1172/JCI90644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ramezani S., Vousooghi N., Kapourchali F.R., Hadjighasem M., Hayat P., Amini N., Joghataei M.T. Rolipram potentiates bevacizumab-induced cell death in human glioblastoma stem-like cells. Life Sci. 2017;173:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2017.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Meloche S., Pouyssegur J. The ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as a master regulator of the G1- to S-phase transition. Oncogene. 2007;26:3227–3239. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chambard J.C., Lefloch R., Pouyssegur J., Lenormand P. ERK implication in cell cycle regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1773:1299–1310. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang L.L., Hu R.C., Dai A.G., Tan S.X. Bevacizumab induces A549 cell apoptosis through the mechanism of endoplasmic reticulum stress in vitro. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015;8:5291–5299. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fack F., Tardito S., Hochart G., Oudin A., Zheng L., Fritah S., Golebiewska A., Nazarov P.V., Bernard A., Hau A.C., et al. Altered metabolic landscape in IDH-mutant gliomas affects phospholipid, energy, and oxidative stress pathways. Embo. Mol. Med. 2017;9:1681–1695. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201707729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Molenaar R.J., Maciejewski J.P., Wilmink J.W., van Noorden C.J.F. Wild-type and mutated IDH1/2 enzymes and therapy responses. Oncogene. 2018;37:1949–1960. doi: 10.1038/s41388-017-0077-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Horbinski C. What do we know about IDH1/2 mutations so far, and how do we use it? Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125:621–636. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1106-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ducray F., Marie Y., Sanson M. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:2248–2249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Paschka P., Schlenk R.F., Gaidzik V.I., Habdank M., Kronke J., Bullinger L., Spath D., Kayser S., Zucknick M., Gotze K., et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent genetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia and confer adverse prognosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 mutation without FLT3 internal tandem duplication. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:3636–3643. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.3762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gross S., Cairns R.A., Minden M.D., Driggers E.M., Bittinger M.A., Jang H.G., Sasaki M., Jin S., Schenkein D.P., Su S.M., et al. Cancer-associated metabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate accumulates in acute myelogenous leukemia with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations. J. Exp. Med. 2010;207:339–344. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Figueroa M.E., Abdel-Wahab O., Lu C., Ward P.S., Patel J., Shih A., Li Y., Bhagwat N., Vasanthakumar A., Fernandez H.F., et al. Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:553–567. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lu C., Ward P.S., Kapoor G.S., Rohle D., Turcan S., Abdel-Wahab O., Edwards C.R., Khanin R., Figueroa M.E., Melnick A., et al. IDH mutation impairs histone demethylation and results in a block to cell differentiation. Nature. 2012;483:474–478. doi: 10.1038/nature10860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hirata M., Sasaki M., Cairns R.A., Inoue S., Puviindran V., Li W.Y., Snow B.E., Jones L.D., Wei Q., Sato S., et al. Mutant IDH is sufficient to initiate enchondromatosis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:2829–2834. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424400112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wise D.R., Ward P.S., Shay J.E., Cross J.R., Gruber J.J., Sachdeva U.M., Platt J.M., DeMatteo R.G., Simon M.C., Thompson C.B. Hypoxia promotes isocitrate dehydrogenase-dependent carboxylation of alpha-ketoglutarate to citrate to support cell growth and viability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:19611–19616. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117773108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hanif F., Perveen K., Jawed H., Ahmed A., Malhi S.M., Jamall S., Simjee S.U. N-(2-hydroxyphenyl)acetamide (NA-2) and Temozolomide synergistically induce apoptosis in human glioblastoma cell line U87. Cancer Cell Int. 2014;14:133. doi: 10.1186/s12935-014-0133-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mesti T., Savarin P., Triba M.N., Le Moyec L., Ocvirk J., Banissi C., Carpentier A.F. Metabolic impact of anti-angiogenic agents on U87 glioma cells. PloS ONE. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang W., Fulci G., Buhrman J.S., Stemmer-Rachamimov A.O., Chen J.W., Wojtkiewicz G.R., Weissleder R., Rabkin S.D., Martuza R.L. Bevacizumab with angiostatin-armed oHSV increases antiangiogenesis and decreases bevacizumab-induced invasion in U87 glioma. Mol. Ther. 2012;20:37–45. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Radoul M., Chaumeil M.M., Eriksson P., Wang A.S., Phillips J.J., Ronen S.M. MR studies of glioblastoma models treated with dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor and temozolomide: Metabolic changes are associated with enhanced survival. Mol. Cancer. 2016;15:1113–1122. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dinca E.B., Lu K.V., Sarkaria J.N., Pieper R.O., Prados M.D., Haas-Kogan D.A., Vandenberg S.R., Berger M.S., James C.D. p53 Small-molecule inhibitor enhances temozolomide cytotoxic activity against intracranial glioblastoma xenografts. Cancer Res. 2008;68:10034–10039. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Anders S., Pyl P.T., Huber W. HTSeq—A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Anders S., Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R106. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (516.3KB, zip)

Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES