Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 7;2019:1849272. doi: 10.34133/2019/1849272

Table 1.

Comparison of different approaches to realize tunable and reconfigurable metadevices.

Tuning Approach Materials External knots Operation spectrum Functionalities Modulation range/speed Ref.
Carrier doping Semiconductors Electrical THz to Visible modulator 55%/2MHz [58]
Optical 90%/NA [38]
Graphene Electrical THz to NIR polarizer/absorber 243°/NA [26]
100%/20GHz [77]
TCO Electrical NIR to Visible phase modulator 30%/10MHz [52]

Phase transition Liquid Crystals Electrical GHz to Visible modulator/beam deflector/color filter 70%/NA [84]
Thermal 12°/NA [111]
Optical 18%/NA [123]
VO2 Electrical THz to visible modulator 80%/1KHz [104]
Thermal modulator 20%/NA [42]
Optical modulator 38%/NA [39]
GST Electrical THz to Visible color tuning 100%/NA [107]
Thermal beam switching NA [106]
Optical modulator 400%/10MHz [40]
Superconductor Thermal GHz to THz modulator 35%/NA [44]

Mechanics MEMS/NEMS Electromechanical GHz to Visible modulator 31%/1KHz [31]
8%/ to MHz [33]
Elasticity Mechanical GHz to Visible Color tuning/Tunable lens 27%/NA [94]
NA/NA [53]
Microfluidics Microfluidics GHz to Visible polarization converter/color printing NA/NA [35]
NA/62Hz [98]

Capacitance Varactor/PIN diode Electrical MHz-GHz Tunable lens/reprogrammable hologram NA/NA [48]
NA/100KHz [49]