Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 12;12:2885–2897. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S210961

Table 2.

Trends in resistance to quinolones, cefotaxime, cefepime, MDR and ACSSuT pattern among iNTS isolates during the study period

Period of isolation No.(%) susceptiblea No. (%) MDRb No. (%) CIPR No. (%) NAR No. (%) CTXR No. (%) CFPR No. (%) ACSSuT Year isolation no.
2007 0 8 (80) 0 4 (40) 0 0 0 10
2008 1 (16.7) 4 (66.7) 0 2 (33.3) 0 0 0 6
2009 2 (20) 7 (70) 0 5 (50) 0 0 0 10
2010 2 (13.3) 11 (73.3) 2 (13.3) 8 (53.3) 0 0 0 15
2011 2 (10) 13 (65) 4 (20) 14 (70) 0 0 0 20
2012 2 (14.3) 8 (57.1) 2 (14.3) 9 (64.3) 2 (14.3) 0 0 14
2013 2 (8.3) 13 (54.2) 4 (16.7) 16 (66.7) 3 (12.5) 0 0 24
2014 4 (18.2) 11 (50) 4 (18.2) 15 (68.2) 3 (13.6) 0 2 (9.1) 22
2015 2 (9.5) 9 (42.9) 4 (19) 14 (66.7) 2 (9.5) 1 (4.8) 1 (4.8) 21
2016 4 (11.1) 11 (30.6) 7 (19.4) 27 (75) 5 (13.9) 2 (5.6) 4 (11.1) 36
Total 21 (11.9) 95 (53.4) 27 (15.2) 114 (64) 15 (8.4) 3 (1.7) 7 (3.9) 178

Abbreviations: susceptiblea, susceptible to all tested antibiotics; MDRb, resistance to three or more antimicrobial classes; CIPR, ciprofloxacin resistant; NAR, nalidixic acid resistant; CTXR, cefotaxime resistant; CFPR, cefepime resistant; ACSSuT, resistance to tetracycline, sulfamethoxazole, streptomycin, chloramphenicol and ampicillin.