Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Aug;42(8):1059–1066. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001084

Table 2.

Performance comparison among PD-L1 antibodies using Fleiss’ kappa analyses to compare performance and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to compare tumor cell (TC) and immune cell (IC) percentages.

Kappa analyses for antibody performance
Kappa 95% confidence interval P Value
SP142 vs. 22C3 0.791 0.660–0.922 <0.001
SP243 vs. E1L3N 0.762 0.631–0.893 <0.001
22C3 vs. E1L3N 0.743 0.612–0.873 <0.001
SP263 vs. SP142 0.724 0.593–0.855 <0.001
SP263 vs. 22C3 0.706 0.575–0.837 <0.001
SP142 vs. E1L3N 0.639 0.508–0.770 <0.001
ICC analyses for TC percentage
ICC 95% confidence interval P value
All four clones 0.900 0.870–0.923 <0.001
SP263 vs. E1L3N 0.949 0.933–0.961 <0.001
22C3 vs. E1L3N 0.939 0.918–0.955 <0.001
SP263 vs. 22C3 0.929 0.905–0.947 <0.001
SP142 vs. 22C3 0.619 0.481–0.717 <0.001
SP263 vs. SP142 0.525 0.340–0.652 <0.001
SP142 vs E1L3N 0.500 0.320–0.629 <0.001
ICC analyses for IC percentage
ICC 95% confidence interval P value
All four clones 0.805 0.76–0.844 <0.001
22C3 vs. E1L3N 0.866 0.826–0.897 <0.001
SP263 vs. SP142 0.722 0.638–0.786 <0.001
SP263 vs. E1L3N 0.695 0.595–0.769 <0.001
SP142 vs. E1L3N 0.667 0.567–0.744 <0.001
SP263 vs. 22C3 0.567 0.435–0.668 <0.001
SP142 vs. 22C3 0.519 0.376–0.630 <0.001