Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2017 Dec 15;97(5):405–410. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.010

Table 2.

Staff training and approach to offering long acting, reversible contraceptives (LARC) at publicly-funded health centers that offered family planning services in the USA, 2013–2014*

Overall Title X Non-title X p value^ Planned Parenthood Community Health Center Health Department Hospital Other p value^
% of clinics with any staff trained in insertin/removing LARC (by type):
 Hormonal Intrauterine Device (IUD) 76% 77% 74% .17 99% 75% 71% 84% 71% < .01
 Copper IUD 74% 76% 72% .02 99% 71% 69% 86% 70% < .01
 Implant 69% 69% 68% .48 98% 65% 62% 85% 66% < .01
% of clinics with staff training in:
 No LARC method 21% 19% 23% .05 <1% 22% 25% 12% 27% < .01
 Any LARC method 79% 81% 77% .05 99% 78% 75% 88% 73% < .01
 All 3 LARC methods 64% 65% 63% .28 98% 59% 57% 82% 63% < .01
Approach to offering IUD: < .01 < .01
 Offered onsite 69% 72% 66% 95% 67% 63% 84% 63%
 Formal referral arrangement# 11% 12% 11% 0% 11% 17% 5% 10%
 Informal referral arrangement 20% 17% 23% 5% 22% 20% 11% 27%
Approach to offering Implant: .04 < .01
 Offered onsite 55% 58% 52% 92% 51% 47% 74% 49%
 Formal referral arrangement# 11% 10% 11% 3% 11% 14% 10% 9%
 Informal referral arrangement 34% 32% 37% 5% 38% 39% 16% 41%
*

Data are weighted.

^

Pearson chi-squared tests.

#

Formal referral arrangement was defined as being co-located with an organization that provided it, having a parent organization that did so, or having a contract with an organization that did so. Informal referrals were defined as having an information relationship with a provider that did so or through referral only.