Table 3.

Odds ratios from a logistic regression examining offering both IUD and implant onsite at publicly-funded health centers providing family planning services in the U.S., 2013–2014, N=1388^*

		Bivariate		Multivariate
Variable	% offering both onsite	Odds ratio	P value	Odds ratio	P value
Total	52%
Health center type - compared to Health Departments	43%
Planned Parenthood	92%	14.91	<.01	9.49	<.01
Community Health Centers	48%	1.22	.07	1.28	.15
Hospital-based clinics	73%	3.64	<.01	2.35	<.01
Other	46%	1.14	.35	1.13	.49
Funding - compared to not funded by Title X	49%
Title X-funded	55%	1.26	<.01	1.55	<.01
Type of area served - compared to mostly urban	69%
Mostly rural	40%	0.29	<.01	0.60	<.01
Combination of urban and rural	56%	0.55	<.01	0.66	.02
Region - Compared to West	58%
South/South West	45%	0.59	<.01	0.69	.02
Mid-West	46%	0.62	<.01	0.59	<.01
North East/Mid-Atlantic	62%	1.17	.31	0.83	.33
Number of Family Planning clients - compared to <500	26%
500–999	50%	2.84	<.01	2.38	<.01
1000–4999	65%	5.39	<.01	3.00	<.01
5000–9999	80%	11.92	<.01	4.29	<.01
10,000+	84%	15.14	<.01	4.24	<.01
Number of clinical services clients - compared to <500	21%
500–999	34%	1.88	<.01	1.18	.58
1000–4999	47%	3.23	<.01	1.51	.11
5000–9999	55%	4.50	<.01	1.57	.13
10,000–49,999	66%	6.97	<.01	2.38	<.01
50,000+	71%	9.17	<.01	2.89	.03
Staff trained in both methods	74%	34.35	<.01

^*Data are weighted.