Skip to main content
. 2019 May 23;11(23):20589–20602. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b22343

Table 2. Contraction-Relaxation Durations and Beating Frequencies of the hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocyte Aggregates Under All Tested Conditions, Analyzed with BeatView Software; n = 4.

material 2D/3D ratioc [mg mL –1] beating rate [BPM] standard deviation contraction–relaxation duration [ms] standard deviation
gelatin coating control 2D 100:0 35.78 ±20.41 568.60 ±127.10a
GELA-ADH coating   100:0 42.35 ±6.69 435.50 ±154.02
GELA-CDH coating   100:0 35.60 ±20.18 662.44 ±268.50a
F7-SPD 3D 0:100 0   0  
F1–3-ADH 2D 40:40 36.71 ±17.74 435.25 ±113.70
    40:20 68.04 ±17.01 305.21 ±65.13
  3D 40:40 72.10 ±15.14 264.14 ±41.97
    40:20 52.70 ±47.60 474.59 ±303.62a
F4–6-CDH 2D 60:60 38.63 b 423.74 b
    60:40 37.73 ±2.78b 434.34 ±38.96b
    40:40 41.56 ±5.33 393.14 ±63.67
  3D 60:60 35.77 ±7.00 403.68 ±44.01
    60:40 37.99 ±6.50 452.44 ±32.85
    40:40 33.82 ±3.02 491.88 ±15.65
a

Major prolongation in contraction–relaxation interval detected in one sample.

b

Elasticity of hydrogel transferring movement over a long distance interferes with the beating analysis; so only one or two aggregates were analyzed successfully.

c

Ratio of gelatin to GG.