Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 18;39(38):7591–7603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2740-18.2019

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Difference RTs for trials in which the singleton distractor was present minus absent, shown as a function of the type of previous trial (distractor-absent vs distractor-present). Data are shown for sham versus FEF stimulation on the right hemisphere. The relative RT disadvantage following distractor-absent versus distractor-present trials decreased following FEF stimulation compared with sham. Error bars indicate SEM. ***p < 0.001.