Table 5.

Logistic regression models

Threatening dating violence
	Female (n = 750)			Male (n = 581)
	AOR	95% CI	p	AOR	95% CI	p
Perpetration
Age	1.23	.85–1.79	.27	1.75	1.02–3.00	.04
Suspension/expulsiona	3.34	2.06–5.43	< .01	2.00	1.14–3.51	.02
Heavy drinkingb	1.56	.90–2.69	.12	0.90	.34–2.39	.83
Marijuana usec	1.59	1.01–2.51	.05	2.85	1.41–5.73	< .01
Rape myth acceptance	0.87	.47–1.63	.67	0.86	.45–1.63	.65
Gender equitable attitudes	0.58	.26–1.26	.16	0.28	.12–.68	< .01
Pornography exposured	1.77	1.05–2.97	.03	1.39	.73–2.65	.32
Victimization
Age	1.37	.98–1.91	.07	1.70	1.22–2.37	< .01
Suspension/expulsiona	1.44	.89–2.33	.14	1.69	1.16–2.46	.01
Heavy drinkingb	2.05	1.32–3.19	< .01	1.09	.44–2.69	.85
Marijuana usec	1.90	1.27–2.83	< .01	1.35	.69–2.62	.38
Rape myth acceptance	0.64	.46–.89	.01	1.09	.76–1.55	.65
Gender equitable attitudes	1.14	.79–1.64	.48	0.73	.41–1.30	.29
Pornography exposured	1.29	.78–2.12	.32	1.34	.72–2.50	.35

^aAbsence of suspension or expulsion is reference category

^bNo past 30-day heavy drinking is reference category

^cNo past 30-day marijuana use is reference category

^dNo reported pornography exposure is the reference category