Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurotoxicology. 2019 Jul 16;74:209–220. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2019.07.002

Figure 5 -.

Figure 5 -

Characterization of locomotion in adult worms. – (A) AE of adult strains On/Off food source. (B) BSR based on AE values. (C) BBs of adult strains On/Off food source. (D) BSR calculated using BBs values. (E) Reversals in adult strains On/Off food source. All analyses methods utilized the same sets of videos. BBs and Reversals utilized the same exact worms. All experiments were completed with 5 biological replicates. (A) n=862 1-way ANOVA Strain [Food=No p<0.0001; Food=Yes p< 0.0001]; Student t-test [(Food=No: cat-2_point vs. N2 p=0.0003) (Food=Yes: cat-2_point vs. N2 p<0.0001; cat-2_deletion vs. N2 p<0.0001; BY200 vs. N2 p=0.0257)]. (B) n=862 1-way ANOVA Strain p=0.0447; Student t-test [BY200 vs. N2 p=0.0123; cat-2_deletion vs. N2 p=0.0380]. (C) n=6511-way ANOVA Strain [Food=No p =.0469; Food=Yes p=< 0.0001]; Student t-test [(Food=No: N2 vs. BY200 p=0.0492) (Food=Yes: cat-2_deletion vs. N2 p<0.0001; BY200 vs. N2 p=0.0001; cat-2_point vs. N2 p=0.0056)]. (D) n=6511-way ANOVA Strain p=<0.0001; Student t-test [BY200 vs. N2 p<0.0001; cat-2_deletion vs. N2 p<0.0001; cat-2_point vs. N2 p=0.0473]. (E) n=6511-way ANOVA Strain [Food=No p=0.0122; Food=Yes p< 0.0001]; Student t-test [(Food=No: BY200 vs. N2 p=0.0025) (Food=Yes: N2 vs. cat-2_deletion p<0.0001; N2 vs. cat-2_point p<0.0001; N2 vs. BY200 p=0.0168)].