Table 3.
Predictor | β | t | p |
---|---|---|---|
(i) Overall empathy—F(5, 348) = 30.28, R2 = 0.30, p < .001 | |||
Sex (1 = male, 0 = female) | − .34 | − 7.48 | < .001 |
Sex × autism | .02 | 0.30 | .77 |
Sex × alexithymia | .10 | 1.95 | .052 |
Autism | − .25 | − 4.72 | < .001 |
Alexithymia | − .18 | − 3.41 | .001 |
(ii) Cognitive empathy–F(6, 347) = 40.61, R2 = 0.41, p < .001 | |||
Affective empathy | .31 | 6.82 | < .001 |
Sex | − 1.62 | − 1.62 | .11 |
Sex × autism | .03 | 0.56 | .57 |
Sex × alexithymia | .01 | 0.10 | .92 |
Autism | − .34 | − 6.96 | < .001 |
Alexithymia | − .23 | − 4.74 | < .001 |
(iii) Affective empathy—F(6, 347) = 22.81, R2 = 0.28, p < .001 | |||
Cognitive empathy | .38 | 6.82 | < .001 |
Sex | − .33 | − 6.99 | < .001 |
Sex × autism | − .02 | − 0.28 | .078 |
Sex × alexithymia | .12 | 2.29 | .023 |
Autism | .12 | 2.03 | .044 |
Alexithymia | .07 | 1.19 | .24 |
Examination of VIF values across the regression analyses indicated that multicollinearity was not a concern (all < 10), and the residuals were normally distributed. Durbin–Watson statistics were inspected and found to be ~ 2 across the regression analyses, suggesting that errors were uncorrelated and thus independent. Together, the data were suitable for multiple linear regression analysis
Β Standardized regression coefficient, t Student’s t-statistic, p p value