TABLE 4.
Multilevel multinomial logistic regression predicting to achieve scoring opportunity vs. no penetration (Reference category).
| Dimension |
Scoring opportunity vs. no penetration (univariate analysis) |
Scoring opportunity vs. no penetration. (multivariate analysis) |
||||
| β | SE | OR (95% CI) | β | SE | OR(95% CI) | |
| Initial penetration | ||||||
| No penetration (Ref) | ||||||
| Penetration | 1.154 | 0.173 | 3.172 (2.260–4.452)∗∗ | 0.630 | 0.228 | 1.877 (1.200–2.937)∗∗ |
| Initial pressure | ||||||
| Initial Pressure (Ref) | ||||||
| Non-initial pressure | 1.020 | 0.208 | 2.772 (1.844–4.167)∗∗ | 1.168 | 0.242 | 3.217 (2.002–5.169)∗∗∗ |
| Duration of the attack | ||||||
| 0–10 s (Ref) | ||||||
| 11–20 s | 1.047 | 0.196 | 2.848 (1.940–4.182)∗∗∗ | 1.679 | 0.251 | 5.359 (3.273–8.774)∗∗∗ |
| 21–30 s | 0.780 | 0.279 | 2.182 (1.263–3.769)∗ | 2.345 | 0.388 | 10.430 (4.873–22.326)∗∗∗ |
| 31 + s | 1.437 | 0.308 | 4.209 (2.302–7.696)∗∗ | 3.089 | 0.451 | 21.953 (9.060–53.191)∗∗∗ |
| Type of attack | ||||||
| Combinative (Ref) | ||||||
| Direct attack | –2.065 | 0.449 | 0.127 (0.053–0.306)∗∗∗ | –0.741 | 0.486 | 0.477 (0.184–1.237) |
| Fast attack | 0.680 | 0.214 | 1.973 (1.297–3.003)∗∗ | 1.953 | 0.327 | 7.049 (3.712–13.387)∗∗∗ |
| Counterattack | 1.293 | 0.277 | 3.645 (2.118–6.274)∗∗∗ | 2.889 | 0.420 | 17.981 (7.884–41.010)∗ |
| Match location | ||||||
| Away (Ref) | ||||||
| Home | 0.502 | 0.189 | 1.652 (1.139–2.395)∗∗ | 0.137 | 0.241 | 1.146 (0.715–1.839) |
| Quality of opposition | ||||||
| Low-ranked (Ref) | ||||||
| Medium-ranked | –1.131 | 0.219 | 0.877 (0.571–1.348) | |||
| High-ranked | 0.341 | 0.254 | 1.406 (0.855–2.313) | |||
| Match status | ||||||
| Losing (Ref) | ||||||
| Drawing | –0.202 | 0.240 | 0.817 (0.511-1.308) | |||
| Winning | 0.041 | 0.277 | 1.042 (0.605-1.792) | |||
| Intercept | –4.062 | 0.492 | 0.017 (0.007-0.045)∗∗∗ | |||
β, Coefficient; SE, Standard error; OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence interval for odds ratio; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.