Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 17;6(5):ENEURO.0204-19.2019. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0204-19.2019

Table 1:

Statistical table

  Sample number: cells (animals) Test type p Value Power
a Sham: 334(7), Ctl: 315(7) Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test 0.1  
b Sham: 315(7), tDCS: 314(7) Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test 0.16  
c Sham: 309(7), tDCS: 301(7) Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test **0.017  
d Sham: 278(6), tDCS: 296(7) Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test 0.95  
e Sham: 285(7), tDCS: 319(7) Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test 0.073  
f Sham: 238(6), tDCS: 356(7) Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test 0.73  
g Sham: 274(7), tDCS: 310(7) Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test 0.8  
h Sham: 266(6), tDCS: 282(6) Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test 0.48  
i Sham: 13(8) Paired t test 0.82 0.055
j tDCS: 11(8) Paired t test **0.014 0.77
k Sham: 13(8), tDCS: 11(8) Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test ***0.006  
l Sham: 11(3), tDCS: 9(2) Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test **0.015  
m Sham: 9(3), tDCS: 12(3) Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test **0.023  

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.03, ***p < 0.01