Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 19;2019(9):CD000400. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000400.pub4

Summary of findings for the main comparison. NSAIDs versus placebo (control).

NSAIDs versus placebo (control)
Patient or population: women with heavy menstrual bleeding
 Intervention: NSAIDs
 Comparison: placebo
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control NSAIDs
MBL (mL/cycle) The mean MBL (mL/cycle) in the intervention groups was
 124 lower
 (186.36 to 61.64 lower) 11
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Lowa
Proportion of women with no subjective improvement in MBL Study population OR 0.08 
 (0.03 to 0.18) 80
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Lowb,c
800 per 1000 242 per 1000
 (107 to 419)
Moderate
800 per 1000 242 per 1000
 (107 to 419)
Quality of life No study reported this outcome
Number of days' bleeding No study reported this outcome
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; MBL: menstrual blood loss; NSAID: non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug; OR: odds ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded two levels for imprecision (very small trial).
 bDowngraded one level for imprecision (single trial).
 cDowngraded one level for risk of bias (no explanation was provided).