Table 1. Comparison of Photocatalytic Performance for the As-prepared TiO2 Samples under UV and Visible Lighta,b,c,d.
UV light |
visible light |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
samples | k (10–2 × min–1) | Ik | RH (μmol/(g h)) | IH | k′ (10–2 × min–1) | I′k | R′H (μmol/(g h)) | I′H |
TiO2-001 | 0.545 | 3.18 | 1100.46 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 4.03 | 1.87 | 8.90 |
R-TiO2-001 | 1.734 | 1475.38 | 4.11 | 16.65 | ||||
TiO2-101 | 2.101 | 1.42 | 446.89 | 2.65 | 1.88 | 2.85 | 0.95 | 13.47 |
R-TiO2-101 | 2.985 | 1185.98 | 5.35 | 12.80 | ||||
TiO2-100 | 0.526 | 2.17 | 165.22 | 3.39 | 0.84 | 1.58 | 0.54 | 8.72 |
R-TiO2-100 | 1.142 | 560.83 | 1.33 | 4.71 |
k and k′ is the apparent rate constant of MO degradation under UV and visible light irradiation.
Ik and I′k is the k and k′ value ratio of TiO2 after and before Ti3+ doping under UV and visible light irradiation, respectively.
RH and R′H is the hydrogen evolution rates for the as-prepared TiO2 samples under UV and visible light irradiation, respectively.
IH and I′H is the hydrogen evolution rate ratio of TiO2 after and before Ti3+ doping under UV and visible light irradiation, respectively.