Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 5;4(12):14902–14912. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01648

Table 1. Comparison of Photocatalytic Performance for the As-prepared TiO2 Samples under UV and Visible Lighta,b,c,d.

UV light
visible light
samples k (10–2 × min–1) Ik RH (μmol/(g h)) IH k′ (10–2 × min–1) Ik RH (μmol/(g h)) IH
TiO2-001 0.545 3.18 1100.46 1.34 1.02 4.03 1.87 8.90
R-TiO2-001 1.734 1475.38 4.11 16.65
TiO2-101 2.101 1.42 446.89 2.65 1.88 2.85 0.95 13.47
R-TiO2-101 2.985 1185.98 5.35 12.80
TiO2-100 0.526 2.17 165.22 3.39 0.84 1.58 0.54 8.72
R-TiO2-100 1.142 560.83 1.33 4.71
a

k and k′ is the apparent rate constant of MO degradation under UV and visible light irradiation.

b

Ik and Ik is the k and k′ value ratio of TiO2 after and before Ti3+ doping under UV and visible light irradiation, respectively.

c

RH and RH is the hydrogen evolution rates for the as-prepared TiO2 samples under UV and visible light irradiation, respectively.

d

IH and IH is the hydrogen evolution rate ratio of TiO2 after and before Ti3+ doping under UV and visible light irradiation, respectively.