Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 18;2(9):e1911598. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11598

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics Between Groups Who Underwent Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy With and Without 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality Models.

Characteristic Participants, No. (%)
Virtual Reality Models (nā€‰=ā€‰44) No Virtual Reality Models (nā€‰=ā€‰48)
Age, mean (SD), y 64.6 (9.7) 57.6 (12.3)
Sex
Male 29 (66) 29 (60)
Female 15 (34) 19 (40)
Race
White 36 (82) 38 (79)
Nonwhite 8 (18) 10 (21)
Nephrometry score
4 5 (11) 11 (23)
5 3 (7) 6 (12)
6 3 (7) 8 (17)
7 5 (11) 8 (17)
8 8 (18) 8 (17)
9 13 (30) 4 (8)
10 5 (11) 2 (4)
11 2 (5) 1 (2)
Surgeon experience with robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy, No. of cases/y
1-10 4 (9) 8 (17)
11-30 7 (16) 7 (15)
>30 33 (75) 33 (69)
Fellow involved in operation 25 (57) 25 (52)
Resident involved in operation 22 (40) 26 (54)
Laterality
Right 26 (59) 20 (42)
Left 18 (41) 28 (58)
Approach
Retroperitoneal 8 (18) 14 (29)
Transperitoneal 36 (82) 34 (71)
Fourth robotic arm used 28 (64) 25 (52)