Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 20;21(8):1719–1725. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0404-y

Table 1.

Overview of the statistical analysis on the presence of a facial gestalt for the four ID syndromes using the three described models (one-sided Mann–Whitney U test)

Data set Model CIF Median CIF simulations U statistic p value
Koolen–de Vries syndrome CFPS 0.993 0.8026 389 4.26 × 10−2a
OpenFace 1.143 0.8026 1 2 × 10−4a
Hybrid 1.191 0.8026 0 <1 × 10−4a
PACS1 CFPS 1.908 0.9656 172 1.90 × 10−2a
OpenFace 1.955 0.9538 68 7.6 × 10−3a
Hybrid 2.523 0.9538 5 8 × 10−4a
PPM1D CFPS 1.011 0.9788 4683.5 4.77 × 10−1
OpenFace 1.667 0.9635 442 4.80 × 10−2a
Hybrid 1.713 0.9635 422.5 4.65 × 10−2a
PHIP CFPS 2.399 0.9736 59.5 7.1 × 10−3a
OpenFace 1.101 0.9597 3098 3.20 × 10−1
Hybrid 2.239 0.9597 54 6.3 × 10−3a

CIFclustering improvement factor, CFPS Clinical Face Phenotype Space, ID intellectual disability.

aStatistically significant difference.