Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2018 Jul 19;3(4):236–251. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2018.1486687

Table 2.

Social network structures among VPLC participating providers

Who are providers likely to contact: “How likely would you be to contact each of the other providers in the VPLC to ask for help with an issue about EBP implementation?”
Time
1 2 3 4 5 6
VPLC1
 Densitya 0.49 0.57 0.64 0.59 0.60 0.61
 B. Densityb 0.34 0.46 0.56 0.46 0.46 0.53
VPLC2
 Density 0.75 0.83 0.78 0.75 0.83 0.75
 B. Density 0.68 0.77 0.71 0.68 0.81 0.68
Who do providers contact: “How many times have you talked to the other providers in the last month, outside of the VPLC?”
Time
1 2 3 4 5 6
VPLC1
 Density 0.31 0.24 0.36 0.23 0.23 0.46
 B. Density 0.14 0.06 0.19 0.04 0.03 0.31
VPLC2
 Density 0.35 0.41 0.33 0.35 0.17 0.35
 B. Density 0.16 0.23 0.14 0.16 0.00 0.16
a

Proportion of all possible ties in social network;

b

Boundary density: proportion of all possible cross-agency ties in social network