Table 2. Within-subject variability of the estimates (that the learning scores are based on) as a function of filtering.
Model | Category | Mean Number of Epochs in which the SD decreased with the use of a particular Filter for a given individual (SD of the Mean) |
Mean Number of Epochs in which the CV decreased with the use of a particular Filter for a given individual (SD of the Mean) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TF compared to NF |
QF compared to NF |
QF compared to TF |
TF compared to NF |
QF compared to NF |
QF compared to TF |
||
M1 | R |
4.66 (2.03) |
5.88 (1.97) |
5.61 (2.03) |
4.23 (1.97) |
6.27 (2.08) |
6.17 (2.22) |
P |
No Diff. |
5.69 (1.97) |
5.69 (1.97) |
No Diff. |
5.82 (2.11) |
5.82 (2.11) |
|
M2 | L |
4.50 (1.97) |
5.12 (2.09) |
5.03 (2.11) |
4.53 (1.92) |
5.74 (2.18) |
5.63 (2.16) |
H |
No Diff. |
5.83 (2.02) |
5.83 (2.02) |
No Diff. |
6.18 (2.10) |
6.18 (2.10) |
|
M3 | LR |
4.50 (1.97) |
5.12 (2.09) |
5.03 (2.11) |
4.53 (1.92) |
5.74 (2.18) |
5.63 (2.16) |
HR |
No Diff. |
5.53 (2.16) |
5.53 (2.16) |
No Diff. |
6.47 (2.14) |
6.47 (2.14) |
|
HP |
No Diff. |
5.69 (1.97) |
5.69 (1.97) |
No Diff. |
5.82 (2.11) |
5.82 (2.11) |
|
M4 | L |
4.50 (1.97) |
5.12 (2.09) |
5.03 (2.11) |
4.53 (1.92) |
5.74 (2.18) |
5.63 (2.16) |
H1 |
No Diff. |
5.88 (2.37) |
5.88 (2.37) |
No Diff. |
6.72 (2.24) |
6.72 (2.24) |
|
H2 |
No Diff. |
5.38 (1.83) |
5.38 (1.83) |
No Diff. |
5.32 (2.03) |
5.32 (2.03) |
|
M5 | LR |
4.50 (1.97) |
5.12 (2.09) |
5.03 (2.11) |
4.53 (1.92) |
5.74 (2.18) |
5.63 (2.16) |
H1R |
No Diff. |
5.53 (2.16) |
5.53 (2.16) |
No Diff. |
6.47 (2.14) |
6.47 (2.14) |
|
H1P |
No Diff. |
5.54 (2.20) |
5.54 (2.20) |
No Diff. |
6.37 (2.13) |
6.37 (2.13) |
|
H2P |
No Diff. |
5.38 (1.83) |
5.38 (1.83) |
No Diff. |
5.32 (2.03) |
5.32 (2.03) |
M1-M5: Model 1 –Model 5
NF: No Filter, TF: Triplet Filter, QF: Quad Filter
No Diff: Filtering did not affect the category, thus no difference could be observed