Table 3.
Langmuir modeling of Fabs binding | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fab | Envelope protein | n | kon (Ms−1) | koff (s−1) | KD (nM) | Sm/NP | Sm/trimer |
PGT145 | BG505 SOSIP | 3 | 2.4 × 105 ± 5.9 × 104 | 3.5 × 10−4 ± 3.3 × 10−6 | 1.8 ± 0.62 | – | 0.94 ± 1.9 × 10−2 |
BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 2.1 × 105 ± 1.6 × 105 | 3.1 × 10−4 ± 1.2 × 10−4 | 4.8 ± 4.2 | 18 ± 0.64 | 0.88 ± 3.2 × 10−2 | |
ConM SOSIP | 4 | 1.6 × 105 ± 1.1 × 104 | 3.8 × 10−4 ± 9.5 × 10−6 | 2.5 ± 0.15 | – | 0.79 ± 5.2 × 10−2 | |
ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 3 | 1.5 × 105 ± 9.5 × 103 | 4.2 × 10−4 ± 3.8 × 10−5 | 2.8 ± 0.26 | 20 ± 2.5 | 0.94 ± 9.9 × 10−2 | |
3BNC117 | BG505 SOSIP | 3 | 3.5 × 104 ± 1.2 × 103 | 9.0 × 10−5 ± 1.3 × 10−5 | 2.6 ± 0.33 | – | 2.9 ± 0.18 |
BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 2.0 × 104 ± 5.0 × 102 | 4.0 × 10−5 ± 3.5 × 10−6 | 2.1 ± 0.15 | 55 ± 0.89 | 2.8 ± 4.5 × 10−2 | |
ConM SOSIP | 2 | 2.7 × 104 ± 5.0 × 102 | 2.6 × 10−4 ± 5.0 × 10−6 | 9.6 ± 0 | – | 2.8 ± 0 | |
ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 1.4 × 104 ± 5.0 × 102 | 7.6 × 10−5 ± 2.4 × 10−5 | 5.8 ± 1.8 | 50 ± 0.39 | 2.5 ± 1.9 × 10−2 | |
PGT122 | BG505 SOSIP | 3 | 1.3 × 104 ± 6.7 × 102 | 1.6 × 10−4 ± 3.1 × 10−5 | 13 ± 2.7 | – | 1.3 ± 1.1 × 10−2 |
BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 3 | 6.6 × 103 ± 2.0 × 102 | 2.4 × 10−4 ± 8.4 × 10−5 | 36 ± 13 | 25 ± 1.2 | 1.3 ± 6.2 × 10−2 | |
ConM SOSIP | 5 | 4.2 × 104 ± 1.4 × 103 | 4.2 × 10−5 ± 6.3 × 10−6 | 0.99 ± 0.14 | – | 2.8 ± 4.7 × 10−2 | |
ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 6 | 3.5 × 104 ± 8.8 × 102 | 1.0 × 10−4 ± 1.7 × 10−5 | 2.9 ± 0.49 | 51 ± 0.82 | 2.5 ± 4.1 × 10−2 | |
35O22 | BG505 SOSIP | 3 | 1.2 × 104 ± 3.3 × 102 | 2.6 × 10−4 ± 2.7 × 10−5 | 22 ± 2.3 | – | 1.5 ± 5.5 × 10−2 |
BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 4.6 × 103 ± 5.0 × 102 | 2.4 × 10−4 ± 1.5 × 10−5 | 51 ± 9.0 | 25 ± 1.9 | 1.2 ± 0.10 | |
ConM SOSIP | 2 | 2.3 × 104 ± 5.0 × 102 | 8.0 × 10−5 ± 1.9 × 10−5 | 3.5 ± 0.90 | – | 1.1 ± 4.8 × 10−2 | |
ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 5.5 × 104 ± 5.0 × 102 | 1.0 × 10−4 ± 1.1 × 10−5 | 1.9 ± 0.25 | 28 ± 1.3 | 1.4 ± 6.5 × 10−2 | |
3BNC315 | BG505 SOSIP | 3 | 5.5 × 103 ± 2.7 × 102 | 4.1 × 10−5 ± 2.3 × 10−5 | 8.8 ± 4.9 | – | 1.7 ± 4.5 × 10−2 |
BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 4.1 × 103 ± 0 | <10−5 | <3 | 22 ± 0.52 | 1.1 ± 2.6 × 10−2 | |
ConM SOSIP | 2 | 3.6 × 104 ± 4.5 × 103 | 1.8 × 10−4 ± 2.0 × 10−5 | 5.1 ± 0.15 | – | 2.2 ± 0.19 | |
ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 1.5 × 104 ± 1.0 × 103 | 6.0 × 10−5 ± 2.4 × 10−5 | 4.2 ± 2.0 | 33 ± 1.7 | 1.6 ± 8.3 × 10−2 |
Conformational-change modeling of PGT151 Fab binding | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fab | Envelope protein | n | kon (Ms−1) | koff (s−1) | kf (s−1) | kb (s−1) | KD (nM) |
PGT151 | BG505 SOSIP | 2 | 9.8 × 104 ± 5.0 × 102 | 1.4 × 10−3 ± 8.6 × 10−4 | 6.2 × 10−3 ± 1.1 × 10−3 | 1.3 × 10−3 ± 3.7 × 10−4 | 15 ± 5.8 |
BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 5.4 × 104 ± 1.0 × 103 | 2.8 × 10−4 ± 5.0 × 10−6 | 8.6 × 10−5 ± 8.4 × 10−5 | 9.1 × 10−4 ± 8.9 × 10−4 | 5.1 ± 0.19 | |
ConM SOSIP | 3 | 9.3 × 104 ± 1.5 × 103 | 6.2 × 10−3 ± 3.1 × 10−4 | 5.7 × 10−3 ± 2.7 × 10−4 | 3.3 × 10−4 ± 5.4 × 10−5 | 67 ± 2.3 | |
ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 4.7 × 104 ± 1.0 × 103 | 1.2 × 10−2 ± 5.0 × 10−4 | 1.2 × 10−2 ± 0 | 2.1 × 10−4 ± 2.5 × 10−5 | 250 ± 5.4 |
Fab | Envelope protein | n | K F | KD(conf) (nM) | Sm/NP | Sm/trimer | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGT151 | BG505 SOSIP | 2 | 5.2 ± 2.2 | 2.3 ± 0.11 | – | 1.8 ± 5.6 × 10−3 | |
BG505 SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 0.17 ± 7.4 × 10−2 | 4.4 ± 0.19 | 29 ± 0.17 | 1.5 ± 8.4 × 10−3 | ||
ConM SOSIP | 3 | 18 ± 4.0 | 3.7 ± 0.56 | – | 1.8 ± 0.12 | ||
ConM SOSIP-I53-50NP | 2 | 59 ± 7.2 | 3.8 ± 0.36 | 37 ± 0.55 | 1.9 ± 2.8 × 10−2 |
Shown are average kinetics (kon = the on-rate constant, kon = the off-rate constant, KD = disassociation constant) and stoichiometry values (Sm = stoichiometry) of replicate (n) SPR experiments with standard error of the mean. Since a Langmuir model did not fit well for PGT151 Fab binding to ConM SOSIP a conformational-change model was used for this particular Fab. Average kinetics and stoichiometry values are shown in addition to conversion constants kf and kb and the forward-conversion-equilibrium constant KF. See also Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Methods for further analysis and explanation