Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 4;20(9):31–41. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12688

Table 1.

Comparison of PTVs coverage for single fixed‐jaw intensity modulated radiotherapy (sF‐IMRT), tangential partial volumetric modulated arc therapy (tP‐VMAT), and F‐IMRT.

  sF‐IMRT F‐IMRT tP‐VMAT P‐values
sF‐IMRT vs tP‐VMAT F‐IMRT vs tP‐VMAT sF‐IMRT vs F‐IMRT
Left PTV
Dmean (cGy) 4362.09 (17.67) 4366.14 (16.49) 4386.60 (12.57) 0.001 0.004 0.559
Dmax (cGy) 4489.46 (35.79) 4468.30 (19.78) 4521.96 (14.69) 0.015 0.000 0.148
V100% 94.60 (2.22) 95.15 (0.60) 93.26 (1.7) 0.134 0.003 0.450
V105% 3.79 (5.15) 0.96 (1.52) 11.65 (7.03) 0.008 0.000 0.107
CI 0.983 (0.013) 0.985 (0.005) 0.980 (0.010) 0.610 0.212 0.703
HTCI 0.874 (0.584) 0.884 (0.051) 0.982 (0.033) 0.000 0.000 0.734
HI 0.066 (0.014) 0.061 (0.010) 0.077 (0.010) 0.040 0.001 0.444
Right PTV
Dmean (cGy) 4365.72 (15.26) 4368.61 (17.63) 4387.2 (9.59) 0.001 0.006 0.546
Dmax (cGy) 4494.34 (51.21) 4465.76 (24.91) 4514.13 (12.51) 0.239 0.000 0.143
V100% 94.87 (3.42) 95.70 (1.05) 94.42 (1.43) 0.376 0.002 0.450
V105% 5.29 (7.97) 1.03 (1.88) 9.21 (5.56) 0.198 0.000 0.114
CI 0.983 (0.018) 0.989 (0.005) 0.983 (0.007) 0.998 0.024 0.315
HTCI 0.757 (0.055) 0.805 (0.075) 0.884 (0.022) 0.000 0.003 0.127
HI 0.070 (0.026) 0.057 (0.009) 0.073 (0.007) 0.686 0.000 0.153
MU 2742.55 (604.93) 2157.91 (371.51) 953.64 (66.16) 0.000 0.000 0.014
QA (%) 97.20 (0.98) 97.35 (1.02) 98.51 (0.73) 0.534 0.581 0.612