Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 5;20(9):122–132. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12691

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Measured leaf motion (left) and gamma pass rate (right) for plan modifications that did not include intentional leaf movement. Notice that the gamma pass rate drops significantly for instances of incorrect beam/energy. Interestingly, the 1 cm retracted × jaw apparently did not result in a significant enough change in measured fluence to trigger a noticeable drop in the gamma pass rate.