Table 2.
RF | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strategy | Start up | # peaks | Accuracy | AUC | p-value |
Stepwise | AUC | 21 | 0.918 ± 0.024 | 0.921 ± 0.025 | 0.0079 |
Kendall's tau | 26 | 0.906 ± 0.008 | 0.897 ± 0.049 | 0.2222 | |
KW | 20 | 0.902 ± 0.030 | 0.917 ± 0.042 | 0.0952 | |
IMP | 27 | 0.910 ± 0.008 | 0.926 ± 0.020 | 0.0079 | |
Forward | AUC | 18 | 0.897 ± 0.032 | 0.896 ± 0.026 | 0.0952 |
Kendall's tau | 35 | 0.901 ± 0.024 | 0.893 ± 0.047 | 0.2222 | |
FE | 25 | 0.902 ± 0.023 | 0.898 ± 0.035 | 0.0556 | |
KW | 26 | 0.906 ± 0.031 | 0.902 ± 0.061 | 0.2222 | |
IMP-ACC | 22 | 0.882 ± 0.032 | 0.864 ± 0.059 | 0.7533 | |
IMP-GINI | 28 | 0.874 ± 0.034 | 0.836 ± 0.037 | 0.5476 | |
No | 583 | 0.866 ± 0.014 | 0.848 ± 0.037 | - |
Mean ± standard deviation accuracy and AUC of the 5-fold cross validation of RF using different numbers of peaks selected by the forward and stepwise feature selection strategies using different orders of peaks and the corresponding performance using RF. AUC, area under the curve; FE, Fisher's exact test; KW, Kruskal-Wallis test; IMP-ACC, importance measure calculated by mean decreased accuracy using RF; IMP-GINI, importance measure calculated by mean decreased impurity using RF.