TABLE 3.

Logistic Regression Models for Lifetime Heterosexual Anal and Oral Sex and Related Condom Use in the Past 12 Months (Women 15–44), Years 2011–2015

Correlates	Ever Had Anal Sex (Unweighted, n = 8813)	Used Condom at Last Anal Sex* (Unweighted, n = 3578)	Ever Received Oral Sex (Unweighted n = 8806)	Ever Gave Oral Sex (Unweighted, n = 8799)	Used Condom at Last Oral Sex† (Unweighted, n = 8011)
			AOR (95% CI)
Race and Hispanic origin
White (non-Hispanic)	Referent	Referent	Referent	Referent	Referent
Hispanic	0.8 (0.7–1.0)‡	1.5 (1.0–2.1)‡	0.3 (0.2–0.4)‡	0.3 (0.3–0.4)‡	2.2 (1.6–3.0)‡
Black (non-Hispanic)	0.5 (0.4–0.6)‡	1.7 (1.3–2.3)‡	0.3 (0.2–0.4)‡	0.2 (0.1–0.2)‡	2.1 (2.0–3.7)‡
Other	0.7 (0.5–0.9)‡	1.2 (0.6–2.1)	0.2 (0.2–0.3)‡	0.2 (0.2–0.3)‡	1.8 (1.0–3.4)
Age, y
15–19	Referent	Referent	Referent	Referent	Referent
20–24	1.6 (1.2–2.2)‡	0.8 (0.5–1.3)	1.3 (0.9–1.9)	1.5 (1.1–2.1)§	0.7 (0.5–1.2)
25–34	1.6 (1.2–2.2)‡	0.8 (0.5–1.3)	1.3 (0.9–1.8)	1.3 (0.9–1.8)	0.8 (0.5–1.3)
35–44	1.7 (1.3–2.4)‡	0.6 (0.4–1.0)§	1.2 (0.8–1.7)	1.2 (0.9–1.8)	0.7 (0.4–1.4)
Marital or cohabiting status
Never married, not cohabiting	Referent	Referent	Referent	Referent	Referent
Currently married	1.1 (1.0–1.4)	0.6 (0.5–0.9)‡	1.0 (0.8–1.3)	1.2 (1.0–1.5)	0.3 (0.2–0.5)‡
Currently cohabiting	1.4 (1.1–1.8)‡	0.6 (0.4–0.8)‡	0.9 (0.7–1.2)	1.0 (0.8–1.3)	0.6 (0.4–0.8)‡
Formerly married, not cohabiting	1.4 (1.1–1.9)‡	0.6 (0.4–0.9)§	0.8 (0.5–1.3)	0.9 (0.6–1.5)	1.2 (0.8–1.8)
Had nonmonogamous sex partner (past 12 mo)
No	Referent	…	Referent	Referent	…
Yes	1.9 (1.5–2.4)‡	…	1.6 (1.1–2.4)§	1.5 (1.0–2.2)§	…
No. lifetime partners¶	1.1 (1.1–1.1)‡	1.0 (1.0–1.0)	1.2 (1.1–1.3)‡	1.2 (1.2–1.3)‡	1.0 (1.0–1.0)‡

Ellipsis (…) indicates variables not included in model.

^*Based only on those who ever had anal sex.

^†Oral-penile sex only (fellatio) and is based only on those who had fellatio.

^‡P < 0.01.

^§P < 0.05.

^¶Data shown are for respondents who reported that they engaged in the outcome.