Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Oct;14(5):1521–1530. doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00079-7

Table 4.

List of most probable connections passing through the white matter clusters showing significant associations of fractional anisotropy (FA) with scam susceptibility adjusting for age, sex, education, white matter hyperintensities (volume and voxelwise), and global cognitive functioning as seen in Figure 1B.

Cluster # Connection between1 Percent2
1 R inferior parietal R superior temporal 30
R superior parietal R superior temporal 17
R putamen R inferior parietal 7
R putamen R superior parietal 4
R interior parietal R insula 3
R thalamus R inferior parietal 3
R inferior parietal R middle temporal 3
2 L lingual L superior temporal 24
L lingual L middle temporal 12
L lateral occipital L superior temporal 8
L lingual L insula 7
L pericalcarine L superior temporal 6
L lateral occipital L middle temporal 4
L fusiform L superior temporal 3
3 R lateral occipital R superior temporal 13
R putamen R lateral occipital 9
R pericalcarine R superior temporal 8
R lateral occipital R middle temporal 8
R interior temporal R lateral occipital 7
R middle temporal R pericalcarine 6
R inferior temporal R pericalcarine 5
R hippocampus R lateral occipital 4
R putamen R pericalcarine 3
4 R inferior temporal R superior temporal 15
R superior parietal R superior temporal 11
R lateral occipital R superior temporal 6
R pericalcarine R superior temporal 5
banks of the R superior temporal sulcus R superior temporal 4
R middle temporal R pericalcarine 3
1

List derived from “regionstat” tool running on the IIT Human Brain Atlas (v4.1).

2

The last column shows the probability that a fiber passing through a voxel of the cluster belongs to a certain connection. We restricted reporting to probabilities ≥3%.