Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar 20;50(5):1651–1658. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26728

Table 2. Sensitivity of NCE-MR, CE-MR, and CT; Consensus Interpretations.

This table illustrates the sensitivities of each modality for each of the 15 diagnoses when considering consensus interpretations (at least two of three radiologists identified the pathology).

Diagnosis Count Consensus Sensitivities
NCE-MR CE-MR CT
Appendicitis 62 93.5%
(87.4 – 99.7%)
96.8%
(92.4 – 100%)
98.4%
(95.3 – 100%)
Ovarian cyst 19 84.2%
(67.8 – 100%)
89.5%
(75.7 – 100.0%)
73.7%
(53.9 – 93.5%)
Diverticulitis 7 28.6% 57.1% 100%
Colitis 4 75% 75% 100%
Enteritis 4 100% 100% 75%
Ureterolithiasis 4 100% 100% 100%
Epiploic Appendagitis 3 33.3% 33.3% 100%
Cholecystitis 2 50% 50% 100%
Cholelithiasis 2 0% 0% 100%
Meckel’s Diverticulitis 2 50% 50% 100%
Pyelonephritis 2 50% 100% 100%
Torsion 2 50% 50% 100%
Abscess 1 100% 100% 0.0%
Degenerating fibroid 1 100% 100% 100%
Ovarian Cancer 1 100% 100% 0%
All Acute Diagnoses 116 82%
(74.9 – 88.9%)
87.1%
(81.0 – 93.2%)
92.2%
(87.3 – 97.1%)
Non-Appendicitis Diagnoses 54 67.9%
(55.4 – 80.5%)
67.9%
(55.4 – 80.5%)
84.9%
(75.3 – 94.5%)