Skip to main content
. 2019 May 6;35(5):867–876. doi: 10.1007/s12264-019-00381-w

Table 2.

Comparison of neurocognitive test results between controls and patient subgroups.

Subgroup1 Subgroup2 Subgroup3 HC
IQ
Verbal IQ 106.77 (13.73) 107.56 (15.29) 106.35 (15.96) 111.97 (15.69)
Performance IQ 103.81 (13.89) 102.51 (15.11) 102.83 (12.54) 109.43 (14.08)
Full scale IQ 106.04 (12.94) 105.83 (14.66) 105.38 (14.39) 111.99 (14.96)
RVP
RVP_TH 15.93 (6.38) 16.04 (6.47) 16.50 (5.85) 17.16 (6.66)
RVP_TM 9.25 (5.31) 8.92 (5.20) 10.50 (5.85) 8.54 (5.68)
RVP_TFA 4.53 (5.97)a* 2.22 (2.55) 1.53 (2.66) 2.28 (3.92)
RVP_TCR 228.64 (65.83) 229.88 (68.66) 249.50 (13.06) 238.25 (57.95)
RVP_ML 396.90 (176.63) 413.85 (173.16) 419.60 (97.53) 397.47 (149.58)
DMS
DMS_MCL 3302.46 (862.46) 3806.51 (1037.83) 3660.62 (1308.04) 3566.87 (895.59)
DMS_MCLA 3417.44 (917.36) 4012.14 (1243.01) 3778.39 (1344.42) 3774.10 (1014.52)
DMS_MCLS 2990.39 (998.33) 3322.36 (1295.71) 3338.51 (1457.27) 3010.15 (809.73)
DMS_TC 33.32 (4.47)a* 33.86 (4.36)b* 34.81 (3.51) 35.56 (3.35)
DMS_TCA 23.68 (4.35)a** 24.14 (4.01)b** 25.22 (3.50) 25.93 (3.07)
DMS_TCS 9.64 (0.62) 9.71 (0.61) 9.59 (0.56) 9.63 (0.66)
DMS_PEGC 0.18 (0.12)a** 0.16 (0.12)b** 0.14 (0.11) 0.11 (0.08)

IQ, intelligence quotient; RVP, rapid visual information processing; DMS, delayed matching to sample; RVP_TFA, total false alarms; DMS_TC, total correct; DMS_TCA, total correct in all delays, DMS_PEGC, probability error given correct. Age, sex and educational level were controlled as covariates in the comparison between each subgroup versus the healthy control group (HC). Details of cognitive variables are described in Table S1.

a*P < 0.05, a*P < 0.01, subgroup 1 compared to HC, b*P < 0.05, b**P < 0.01, subgroup 2 compared to HC.