Table 2.
Study | Purpose(s) | Design | Sample | How addressed concepts from theory | Data Analysis |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cancer screening study among Hmong women (Lor, Khang, Xiong, Moua, & Lauver, 2013) | To understand Hmong women’s underuse of breast and cervical cancer screening, guided by theory | Descriptive Cross-sectional |
Group of 16 Hmong women, aged 24 to 73. Primary language for most participants was Hmong. |
In a focus group, asked open-ended questions, based on concepts from theory. For each, we asked at least one question. | Conducted directed, content analysis of participants’ responses. Coding categories were based primarily on TCSB concepts. |
|
Sexually- transmitted infection screening study (Backonja, Royer, & Lauver, 2014) | To describe people’s reasons to seek sexual transmitted infections (STIs) screening, guided by theory | Descriptive, Cross-sectional |
330 college students, 216 female and 114 male; ≥18 years. Most were White and had never been screened for STIs. | Designed a questionnaire, based on concepts from theory. Asked closed-ended questions with checklists and open-ended. Asked at least one question. | Analyzed responses to closed-ended questions with descriptive statistics. Conducted directed, content analysis of participants’ responses to open-ended questions. Coding categories were based primarily on TCSB concepts. |
|
Cancer screening intervention study (Lauver, Settersten Kane, & Henriques, 2003) | To test effects of a nurse-delivered, patient-centered intervention, guided by concepts from theory, on women’s breast screening behaviors. To assess whether intervention effects differed by external conditions, based on proposition from theory. |
Randomized, control trial. Women assigned randomly to one of three message conditions (nothing initially, usual care, or tailored discussion, based on theory.) Example outcomes: Rates of clinical breast examination and mammography use. Collected data at 3 points in time: baseline, 3–4 months post-intervention, and 13–16 months post-intervention. |
797 women recruited from 3 sources (a hospital including based radiology department serving low-income urban clients, and control participants from a case-control study) To control for habit, we excluded women who had had mammograms in prior 13 months. |
Intervener served as a normative influence. Assessed and addressed concepts from theory (e.g., typical affect, utility beliefs, and norms) in tailored discussions with participants assigned to theory-based, message condition. Measured external conditions with questionnaire. |
Conducted hierarchical regressions. Determined whether message condition influenced rate of breast cancer screening behaviors. Examined also whether degree of external conditions moderated rates of screening behaviors. |