Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
Down syndrome (DS) is the most prevalent chromosomal disorder characterized by intellectual disability, multiple organ anomalies, generalized muscular hypotonia, and characteristic physical features. The presence of congenital cardiac disease, infantile spasms, and congenital hypothyroidism that are often observed in DS patients have contributed to brain morphologic changes. The aim of this study was to evaluate brain morphologic characteristics during infant and toddler ages in patients with DS using structural brain magnetic resonance images (MRI).
METHODS:
Structural brain T1-weighted MRI from DS participants with complete chromosome 21 trisomy (n=20; 1.6 ± 0.6 [mean±standard deviation] years old) were analyzed with FreeSurfer. The measurements were compared to those of 60 gender- and age-matched neurotypical controls with Cohen’s d statistic and unpaired t-test with the false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons, and analyzed by univariate general linear model with the following DS-associated medical comorbidities: congenital cardiac disease, infantile spasms, and hypothyroidism.
RESULTS:
We identified 27 candidate measurements with large effect sizes (absolute d >0.8) and statistically significant differences (p < 6.9 × 10–3). Among them, decreased volumes in bilateral cerebellar gray matter (GM), right cerebellar white matter, brainstem, and cortical abnormalities in the right superior temporal, right rostral anterior cingulate, and left rostral middle frontal gyrus, independent of comorbid effects. Only bilateral cerebellar GM volumes and brainstem volume showed differences between DS and healthy groups during infancy.
CONCLUSION:
These results suggest that cerebellar GM and brainstem may represent the primary regions affected by the presence of an additional copy of chromosome 21.
Keywords: brain morphology, cerebellum, brainstem, epilepsy, hypothyroidism
1. INTRODUCTION
Down syndrome (DS, OMIM 190685), or trisomy 21, is the most prevalent chromosomal disorder with an incident rate of over 1 per 700 live births.1 DS is characterized by intellectual disability, multiple organ anomalies, generalized muscular hypotonia, and characteristic physical features such as a flat nasal bridge, upward-slanting palpable fissure, and single transverse palmar crease.2 Cognitive impairment in DS is characterized by learning, memory, and speech/language problems.1 Other major medical comorbidities include congenital cardiac disease (40–50%), hearing loss (75%), eye disease (60%), thyroid disease (4–18%), and seizures (1–13%) such as infantile spasms.2 Prior neuropathological studies revealed several abnormalities in brain development in DS such as neuronal migration, a hypocellular hippocampal dentate gyrus, and reduced cerebellar expansion during the late prenatal period.3 In the cerebral cortex of fetal DS brains, delayed and disorganized cortical lamination4 and low concentration of neurotransmitters5 have been reported.
Neuroimaging has the potential to play an important role in further understanding neurological and neurodevelopmental impairments in DS. Although at least 14 structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have been published so far, the majority of them focused on DS patients greater than 5 years old (YO).1 The presence of congenital cardiac disease,6 infantile spasms,7 and congenital hypothyroidism8 that are often observed in DS patients have contributed to brain morphologic changes in prior structural brain MRI studies with non-DS patients. Infants with congenital cardiac diseases had smaller brain measures in the frontal lobe, parietal lobe, cerebellum, and brainstem.6 Infants with infantile spasms had various developmental or acquired structural abnormalities in 71% of cases according to a quantitative study.7 Children with congenital hypothyroidism had regional thickening or thinning in cortical thicknesses.8
Moreover, DS patients show accelerated ageing both in clinical symptoms and structural brain MRI in adult ages.9 Because infantile spasms occur in late infancy2,7 and the risk of hypothyroidism increases with age,2 brain morphology in DS is expected to be affected by comorbidities and aging. Therefore, analysis of young children with DS that considers the effects of comorbidities may assist in accurately revealing abnormal brain morphology associated with DS. In this study, we explored brain morphology in DS patients under 3 YO, through a comparative analysis with neurotypical controls (NC) while considering the effects of comorbidities.
2. METHODS
2.1. Participants
After approval by the Institutional Review Board at Boston Children Hospital (BCH), we reviewed electronic medical records from June 1st, 2008 to February 24th, 2016, to assemble a cohort of patients with DS. Gender- and age-matched NC were selected from our in-house database composed of electronic records of healthy participants without neurological disorders, neuropsychological disorders or epilepsy.10 After excluding 3 DS cases (see below), we used data from 20 patients with DS (13 males and 7 females) and 60 NC participants (39 males and 21 females). The leading reasons for the MRI examination in neurotypical controls were headaches (60%), to rule out intracranial pathologies (13%), vomiting (11%), and night awakenings (10%). The indications for MRI scans in the DS group were the assessments of various diseases such as nystagmus, papilledema, spasmus nutans, and infantile spasms.
2.2. Structural MRI acquisition and processing
Both DS and NC participants ware imaged with the same model of clinical 3T MRI scanners (Skyra, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) at BCH. Because of the clinical and retrospective nature of this study, there is variability in the pulse sequences employed to acquire T1-weighted volumetric examinations. Spatial resolution varied in the x and y directions from 0.219 to 1.354 mm (mean: 0.917 mm, standard deviation [SD]: 0.124 mm). Through-plane slice thickness varied from 0.500 to 2.000 mm (mean: 0.996 mm, SD: 0.197 mm). After excluding low quality images due to motion artifacts, DICOM files of T1-weighted volumetric examinations were accessed through the Children’s Research and Integration System11 and analyzed with the recon-all command on FreeSurfer version 5.3.12 Through this process, 1,573 regionally distributed measurements (463 for regional volume, 448 for surface area, and 662 for cortical thickness) were extracted from each imaging examination. The measurements were extracted using the brain atlases (“aseg.stats”) for subcortical segmentation and (“aparc”, “aparc.a2009s”, and “aparc.DKT40”) for automatic cortical paracellations.
Each FreeSurfer output from a T1 structural examination displayed with a labeled overlay map on FreeView (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) were visually inspected for quality of regional segmentation results, and examinations were excluded from analysis despite manual corrections if FreeSurfer results were observed to substantially fail. Three scans of 3 DS cases were excluded from this study because of such failed FreeSurfer processing. After excluding these cases, there were 20 structural brain MR examinations from 20 DS participants. Age at MRI scans were not significantly different (T (78) = −0.096, p = 0.92) between DS and NC on a Student’s t test (1.6 ± 0.6 and 1.6 ± 0.5 [mean ± SD] in both DS and NC, respectively).
2.3. Statistical analysis
The equality of means in each brain morphology measurement between DS and NC participants were evaluated with Cohen’s d test, Levene’s test for equality of variances, and a two-tailed unpaired t test for two groups of samples with the false discovery rate correction (q=0.005) for multiple comparisons. We identified candidate measurements with large size effects (absolute d > 0.8) and statistically significant differences (p < 6.9 × 10−3). For each identified measurement, a Univariate General Linear Model (GLM) (p < 0.05) was constructed to evaluate the effects of binary or continuous covariates (age, gender, and presence of congenital cardiac disease, infantile spasms, and hypothyroidism). Critical values from the F-distribution calculation were determined to be F(0.05,6,73) = 2.22 and F(0.05, 1,73) = 3.97 for the corrected model and each covariate, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 19 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY).
3. RESULTS
DS participants in the current study showed complete 21 trisomy in all cases, congenital cardiac disease in 75% (atrioventricular canal defect in 35%, ventricular septal defect in 15%, and others in 25%), infantile spasms in 15%, and hypothyroidism in 30% (Table 1). The total volumes of the intra-cranial space, cortical gray matter (GM), cortical white matter (WM), and subcortical GM were not statistically significantly different in DS and NC participants (Table 2).
Table 1.
Down syndrome (N=20) | Neurotypical controls (N=60) | |
---|---|---|
The rate of male (N [%]) | 13 / 20 [65%] | 39 / 60 [65%] |
Age of years (mean [SD]) | ||
in total participants | 1.6 [0.6] | 1.6 [0.5] |
in male participants | 1.5 [0.5] | 1.5 [0.5] |
in female participants | 1.8 [0.8] | 1.8 [0.6] |
Congenital cardiac disease (N [%]) | 15 / 20 [75%] | 0 / 60 [0%] |
Infantile spasm (N [%]) | 3 / 20 [15%] | 0 / 60 [0%] |
Hypothyroidism (N [%]) | 6 / 20 [30%] | 0 / 60 [0%] |
Abbreviation; SD, standard deviation
Table 2.
Measurement | DS (N = 20) Mean [SD] |
NC (N = 60) Mean [SD] |
The rate of DS/NC |
t | df | p value | Absolute Cohen’s d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category; aseg | |||||||
Estimated total intracranial volume (mm2) | 927348 [171768] | 1083446 [195133] | 0.86 | −3.2 | 78 | 0.0021 | 0.82 |
Total cortical GM volume (mm2) | 360050 [104933] | 426319 [118838] | 0.84 | −2.2 | 78 | 0.029 | 0.57 |
Total cortical WM volume (mm2) | 219022 [44640] | 247444 [69445] | 0.89 | −2.1 | 51.3 | 0.039 | 0.44 |
Total subcortical GM volume (mm2) | 37461 [8274] | 42244 [9685] | 0.89 | −2.0 | 78 | 0.051 | 0.51 |
Abbreviation; DS, Down syndrome; NC, neurotypical controls; SD, standard deviation; GM, gray matter; WM, white matter
Among measurements generated by the FreeSurfer recon-all pipeline, 19 brain morphologic measurements were identified for further analyses as the candidate measurements with large effect sizes and statistically significant p values (Table 3). The 19 candidate measurements included cerebellar volumes, brainstem volume, and some cortical measurements (surface areas, volumes, and SD of the thickness) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Measurement | DS (N=20) Mean [SD] |
NC (N = 60) Mean [SD] |
The rate of DS/NC |
t | df | p value | Absolute Cohen’s d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Annotation format; aseg | |||||||
Left cerebellar GM, volume (mm3) | 32372 [5461] | 47260 [6653] | 0.68 | −9.0 | 78 | 9.3 × 10−14 | 2.33 |
Right cerebellar GM, volume (mm3) | 32007 [5489] | 47761 [6539] | 0.67 | −9.7 | 78 | 5.1 × 10−15 | 2.50 |
Right cerebellar WM, volume (mm3) | 5924 [1036] | 9149 [2288] | 0.65 | −8.6 | 70.8 | 1.4 × 10−12 | 1.57 |
Brainstem, volume (mm3) | 9061 [1694] | 12399 [2069] | 0.73 | −6.5 | 78 | 6.5 × 10−9 | 1.68 |
Annotation format; aparc | |||||||
Lh rostral middle frontal ThickStd (mm) | 0.73 [0.08] | 0.89 [0.17] | 0.82 | −5.8 | 70 | 2.1 × 10−7 | 1.06 |
Rh rostral middle frontal ThickStd (mm) | 0.74 [0.071] | 0.89 [0.16] | 0.83 | −5.7 | 71.9 | 2.3 × 10−7 | 1.04 |
Rh rostral anterior cingulate SurfArea (mm2) | 215.1 [73.3] | 356.4 [146.0] | 0.6 | −5.6 | 65.7 | 4.5 × 10−7 | 1.07 |
Rh rostral anterior cingulate GM, volume (mm3) | 865 [379] | 1470 [639] | 0.59 | −5.1 | 56.4 | 4.6 × 10−6 | 1.03 |
Rh superior temporal GM, volume (mm3) | 7000 [2152] | 10063 [3229] | 0.70 | −4.8 | 49.3 | 1.5 × 10−5 | 1.02 |
Lh rostral anterior cingulate GM, volume (mm3) | 1080 [442] | 1751 [848] | 0.62 | −4.4 | 60.1 | 4.0 × 10−5 | 0.87 |
Rh supramarginal gyrus, SurfArea (mm2) | 2242 [465] | 2883 [846] | 0.78 | −4.3 | 60.4 | 7.4 × 10−5 | 0.83 |
Annotation format; aparc.a2009 | |||||||
Lh inferior frontal sulcus, ThickStd (mm) | 0.55 [0.11] | 0.73 [0.22] | 0.75 | −4.9 | 64.2 | 7.9 × 10−6 | 0.93 |
Lh anterior part of the cingulate gyrus and sulcus, SurfArea (mm2) | 772 [212] | 1087 [392] | 0.71 | −4.5 | 61.2 | 2.8 × 10−5 | 0.88 |
Rh supramarginal gyrus, SurfArea (mm2) | 1095 [178] | 1492 [427] | 0.73 | −5.8 | 74.1 | 1.3 × 10−7 | 1.04 |
Rh lateral aspect of the superior temporal gyrus, SurfArea (mm2) | 709 [146] | 938 [254] | 0.76 | −4.9 | 57.7 | 7.2 × 10−6 | 0.98 |
Rh inferior segment of the circular sulcus of the insula GM, volume (mm3) | 1223 [302] | 1720 [416] | 0.71 | −4.9 | 78 | 4.8 × 10−6 | 1.27 |
Rh inferior frontal sulcus, ThickStd (mm) | 0.58 [0.10] | 0.74 [0.21] | 0.78 | −4.6 | 66.2 | 2.3 × 10−5 | 0.86 |
Rh transverse temporal sulcus, SurfArea (mm2) | 107 [36] | 159 [65] | 0.67 | −4.4 | 56.5 | 4.3 × 10−5 | 0.88 |
Lh frontal superior gyrus, SurfArea (mm2) | 2641 [505] | 3399 [1056] | 0.78 | −4.3 | 68.1 | 6.0 × 10−5 | 0.80 |
Annotation format; aparc.DKTatlas40 | |||||||
Lh rostral middle frontal GM, ThickStd (mm) | 0.74 [0.08] | 0.89 [0.2] | 0.82 | −5.7 | 71.7 | 2.6 × 10−7 | 1.03 |
Rh rostral middle frontal GM, ThickStd (mm) | 0.73 [0.07] | 0.88 [0.17] | 0.83 | −5.5 | 73.6 | 4.8 × 10−7 | 0.99 |
Rh superior temporal GM, SurfArea (mm2) | 2745 [608] | 3626 [967] | 0.76 | −4.8 | 52.5 | 1.5 × 10−5 | 0.99 |
Rh rostral anterior cingulate GM, SurfArea (mm2) |
251 [77] | 406 [149] | 0.62 | −6.0 | 64.3 | 1.2 × 10−7 | 1.15 |
Rh rostral anterior cingulate GM, volume (mm3) | 1022 [406] | 1695 [663] | 0.60 | −5.4 | 54.6 | 1.8 × 10−6 | 1.10 |
Rh supramarginal GM, SurfArea (mm2) | 2140 [438] | 2765 [790] | 0.77 | −4.4 | 59.9 | 4.3 × 10−5 | 0.87 |
Lh caudal anterior cingulate GM, ThickStd | 0.66 [0.18] | 0.90 [0.28] | 0.74 | −4.3 | 51.7 | 8.3 × 10−5 | 0.89 |
(mm) | |||||||
Lh rostral anterior cingulate GM, volume (mm3) | 1376 [643] | 2217 [1066] | 0.62 | −4.2 | 55.2 | 9.6 × 10−5 | 0.86 |
Abbreviation; DS, Down syndrome; NC, neurotypical controls; SD, standard deviation; GM, gray matter; WM, white matter; Lh, left hemisphere; Rh, right hemisphere; SurfArea, Surface Area; ThickStd, Thickness standard deviation
Univariate GLM demonstrated that the presence of DS was an independent significant factor in the differences observed in bilateral cerebellar GM volumes, right cerebellar WM volume, brainstem volume, volume and surface area of the right rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), volume of the right superior temporal cortex (STC), and SD of the cortical thickness of the left rostral middle frontal cortex (MFC). For these identified measurements, age was always a statistically significant covariate. The comparison between DS and NC was statistically significantly affected by gender, while not by any presence of comorbidities (congenital cardiac disease, infantile spasms, and hypothyroidism) (Table 4). Bilateral cerebellar GM volumes and brainstem volumes have demonstrated marked disparity in the infantile period between DS and NC participants (Fig. 1A,B,D). In the right cerebellar WM volume, and right STC volume, and right rostral ACC volume, a gradually increasing difference between the two groups was observed as age increased after about 2 YO (Fig. 1C,E,F).
Table 4.
Adjusted R squire | Corrected Model | DS | Age | Gender | Congenital Cardiac disease | Infantile spasm | Hypothy roidism | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Annotation format; aseg | ||||||||
Left cerebellar GM, volume | .638 | F = 24.2 | F = 10.8 | F = 24.9 | F = 2.4 | F = 2.2 | F = 1.5 | F = .31 |
p = 1.5 × 10−15 | p = .002 | p = 4.0 × 10−6 | p = .13 | p = .14 | p = .22 | p = .58 | ||
Right cerebellar GM, volume | .682 | F = 29.2 | F = 11.9 | F = 32.1 | F = 3.6 | F = 3.1 | F = .38 | F = 1.8 |
p = 1.5 × 10−17 | p = .001 | p = 2.8 × 10−7 | p = .06 | p = .08 | p = .54 | p = .18 | ||
Right cerebellar WM, volume | .387 | F = 9.3 | F = 9.0 | F = 12.4 | F = 4.1 | F = .14 | F = .13 | F = 1.2 |
p = 1.4 × 10−7 | p = .004 | p = .001 | p = .047 | p = .71 | p = .72 | p = .28 | ||
Brainstem, volume | .654 | F = 25.9 | F = 9.6 | F = 69.7 | F= 2.9 | F = .68 | F = .35 | F = .68 |
p = 2.8 × 10−16 | p = .003 | p = 3.1 × 10−12 | p = .09 | p = .41 | p = .56 | p = .41 | ||
Annotation format; aparc | ||||||||
Lh rostral middle frontal ThickStd | .325 | F = 7.35 | F = 5.6 | F = 21.6 | F = .67 | F = .16 | F = .99 | F = .26 |
p = 3.6 × 10−6 | p = .02 | p = 1.5 × 10−5 | p = .42 | p = .70 | p = .32 | p = .61 | ||
Rh rostral middle frontal ThickStd | .226 | F = 4.6 | F = 3.4 | F = 9.9 | F = .26 | F = .004 | F = .17 | F = .009 |
p = 3.2 × 10−4 | p = .068 | p = .002 | p = .62 | p = .95 | p = .68 | p = .92 | ||
Rh rostral anterior cingulate SurfArea | .517 | F = 14.8 | F = 5.0 | F = 55.2 | F = .76 | F = .06 | F = .04 | F < .01 |
p = 7.3 × 10−11 | p = .03 | p = 1.9 × 10−10 | p = .39 | p = .81 | p = .84 | p = .99 | ||
Rh rostral anterior cingulate GM, volume | .529 | F = 4.9 | F = 3.7 | F = 59.0 | F = .23 | F = .27 | F = .02 | F = .008 |
p = 3.2 × 10−4 | p = .057 | p = 6.6 × 10−11 | p = .59 | p = .61 | p = .88 | p = .93 | ||
Rh superior temporal GM, volume | .580 | F = 19.2 | F = 5.4 | F = 78.1 | F = .53 | F = .03 | F = 1.4 | F = .19 |
p = 2.8 × 10−13 | p = .023 | p = 3.7 × 10−13 | p = .47 | p = .86 | p = .25 | p = .67 | ||
Lh rostral anterior cingulate GM, volume | .471 | F = 12.7 | F = 3.3 | F = 57.1 | F = 0.1 | F = .02 | F = .02 | F < .01 |
p = 8.7 × 10−10 | p = .075 | p = 9.6 × 10−11 | p = .82 | p = .88 | p = .90 | p = .93 | ||
Rh supramarginal gyrus, SurfArea | .373 | F = 8.8 | F = .90 | F = 36.3 | F = 4.2 | F = .23 | F = .058 | F = 1.9 |
p = 3.1 × 10−7 | p = .35 | p = 6.3 × 10−8 | p = .044 | p = .63 | p = .81 | p = .17 | ||
Annotation format; aparc.a2009 | ||||||||
Lh inferior frontal sulcus, ThickStd | .176 | F = 3.8 | F = 2.1 | F = 7.8 | F = .20 | F = .006 | F = .73 | F = .03 |
p = .002 | p = .16 | p = .007 | p = .66 | p = .94 | p = .40 | p = .86 | ||
Lh anterior part of the cingulate gyrus and sulcus, SurfArea | .499 | F = 14.1 | F = 2.7 | F = 57.2 | F = .008 | F = .40 | F = 1.3 | F = .06 |
p = 1.3 × 10−10 | p = .10 | p = 9.3 × 10−11 | p = .93 | p = .53 | p = .27 | p = .82 | ||
Rh Supramarginal gyrus, SurfArea | .452 | F =11.9 | F = 3.0 | F = 42.2 | F = 10.6 | F = .02 | F = .04 | F = 2.3 |
p = 3.0 × 10−9 | p = .09 | p = 8.7 × 10−9 | p = .002 | p = .89 | p = .85 | p = .14 | ||
Rh lateral aspect of the superior temporal gyrus, SurfArea | .404 | F = 9.9 | F = 1.8 | F = 36.1 | F = 1.2 | F = .27 | F = .42 | F = .58 |
p = 5.6 × 10−8 | p = .19 | p = 6.7 × 10−8 | p = .28 | p = .61 | p = .52 | p = .45 | ||
Rh inferior segment of the circular sulcus of the insula GM, volume | .331 | F = 7.5 | F = 3.8 | F = 15.8 | F = .08 | F = .11 | F = .08 | F = .19 |
p = 2.7 × 10−6 | p = .054 | p = 1.6 × 10−4 | p = .78 | p = .74 | p = .79 | p = .66 | ||
Rh frontal inferior sulcus, ThickStd | .162 | F = 3.5 | F = 2.1 | F = 8.4 | F < .01 | F < .01 | F = .73 | F = .93 |
p = 3.9 × 10−3 | p = .15 | p = 5.1 × 10−3 | p = .95 | p = .93 | p = .40 | p = .76 | ||
Rh transverse temporal sulcus, SurfArea | .340 | F = 7.8 | F = .33 | F = 28.5 | F = 1.7 | F = .56 | F = .36 | F = 3.3 |
p = 1.7 × 10−6 | p = .57 | p = 1.0 × 10−6 | p = .20 | p = .46 | p = .55 | p = .075 | ||
Lh frontal superior gyrus, SurfArea | .560 | F = 17.8 | F = 2.5 | F = 82.4 | F = .70 | F = .74 | F = .68 | F = .91 |
p = 1.4 × 10−12 | p = .12 | p = 1.3 × 10−13 | p = .11 | p = .68 | p = .41 | p = .34 | ||
Annotation format; aparc.DKTatlas40 | ||||||||
Lh rostral middle frontal GM, ThickStd | .293 | F = 6.4 | F = 4.8 | F = 18.7 | F = .99 | F = .05 | F = .32 | F = .17 |
p = 1.7 × 10−5 | p = .03 | p = 4.9 × 10−5 | p = .32 | p = .82 | p = .57 | p = .68 | ||
Rh rostral middle frontal GM, ThickStd | .173 | F = 3.8 | F = 3.1 | F = 6.4 | F = .08 | F < .01 | F = .31 | F = .04 |
p = .003 | p = .08 | p = .013 | p = .77 | p > .99 | p = .58 | p = .85 | ||
Rh superior temporal GM, SurfArea | .536 | F = 16.2 | F = 1.8 | F = 63.9 | F = .28 | F = 1.0 | F = .005 | F = .36 |
p = 9.1 × 10−12 | p = .18 | p = 1.5 × 10−11 | p = .60 | p = .32 | p = .94 | p = .55 | ||
Rh rostral anterior cingulate GM, SurfArea | .522 | F = 15.0 | F = 6.3 | F = 53.7 | F = .44 | F = .02 | F = .69 | F = .046 |
p = 5.1 × 10−11 | p = .014 | p = 3.0 × 10−10 | p = .51 | p = .89 | p = .41 | p = .83 | ||
Rh rostral anterior cingulate GM, volume | .554 | F = 16.9 | F = 4.3 | F = 63.2 | F = .13 | F = .28 | F = .05 | F = .08 |
p = 4.9 × 10−12 | p = .042 | p = 2.1 × 10−11 | p = .72 | p = .60 | p = .83 | p = .78 | ||
Rh supramarginal GM, SurfArea | .375 | F = 8.9 | F = .97 | F = 35.1 | F = 5.1 | F = .30 | F = .028 | F = 1.8 |
p = 2.7 × 10−7 | p = .33 | p = 9.4 × 10−8 | p = .027 | p = .58 | p = .87 | p = .18 | ||
Lh caudal anterior cingulate GM, ThickStd | .099 | F = 2.4 | F = 3.6 | F = .25 | F = 2.3 | F = .011 | F = .05 | F = 1.2 |
p = .033 | p = .06 | p = .62 | p = .13 | p = .92 | p = .82 | p = .27 | ||
Lh rostral anterior cingulate GM, volume | .501 | F = 14.2 | F = 3.2 | F = 62.1 | F < .01 | F < .01 | F = .012 | F < .01 |
p = 1.2 × 10−10 | p = .077 | p = 2.4 × 10−11 | p = .95 | p = .97 | p = .91 | p = .99 |
Bold indicates values with a statistically significance. Abbreviation; DS, Down syndrome; NC, neurotypical controls; GM, gray matter; WM, white matter; Lh, left hemisphere; Rh, right hemisphere; SurfArea, Surface Area; ThickStd, Thickness standard deviation
4. DISCUSSION
We quantitatively evaluated brain morphology in infants and toddlers with DS using structural MRI. Our results showed decreased volumes in the bilateral cerebellar GM, right cerebellar WM, and brainstem, as well as cortical abnormalities in the right STC, right rostral ACC, and left rostral MFC in DS patients. While the timing of the comorbidities was different such as CHD in early infancy, IS in late infancy, and hypothyroidism at any age, our analysis indicates that these differences in brain morphology develop over time. Only bilateral cerebellar GM volumes as well as the brainstem volume were observed as statistically significantly different between our two groups in infancy.
Prior brain morphologic studies in children with DS13–20 demonstrated decreased volumes in the global cerebrum,15,16,20 cerebellum,13,18–20 and brainstem.13,14,19 In contrast to findings of global brain volume loss, regionally preserved volumes in the temporal GM19 and WM20, parietal GM20 and WM19, and subcortical GM20 were reported.
Only two studies reported brain morphology of infants and toddlers with DS, to the best of our knowledge.13,14 Gunbey et al (2017) analyzed structural brain MRI of 10 DS patients with the mean age of 2.6 YO, and reported decreased volume in the brainstem, thalamus, basal ganglia, cerebellar cortex, right cerebellar WM, and corpus callosum.13 An additional analysis assessed brainstem components in 32 DS patients with a mean age of 3.7 YO, and they noted a smaller pons in DS compared to NC.14 Similarly, the pontine hypoplasia has been noted in adults with DS.21 The findings of decreased volume in the cerebellar cortex and brainstem are consistent with our results. The “brainstem” in the FreeSurfer version 5.3 pipeline includes the medulla oblongata, the pons, the midbrain, and the superior cerebellar peduncle. However, the volumes of the substructures of “brainstem” are not generated by the recon-all command with FreeSurfer version 5.3. Therefore, we could not reconfirm the pontine hypoplasia in DS. It is possible that the pontine hypoplasia often observed in DS is the leading abnormality of our findings.
The measurements in our study using FreeSurfer were extracted from multiple cortical automatic parcellations (“aparc”, “aparc.a2009s”, and “aparc.DKT40”). Thus, brain measurements include some from overlapping regions in our datasets. These annotation formats were manually made with 34 cortical regions per hemisphere from 40 participants according to a sulcus approach, 74 cortical regions per hemisphere from 24 participants according to anatomical conventions, and 40 cortical regions per hemisphere from 101 participants according to a surface-based approach in Desikan/Killiany Atlas (“aparc”), Destrieux Atlas (“aparc.a2009s”), and Desikan–Killiany–Tourville atlas (“aparc.DKT40”), respectively. Because pros and cons of these annotation atlases have not been established as a consensus, we analyzed all data from the three atlases.
Our results demonstrated DS-associated abnormal cortical development in the right rostral ACC, right STC, and left MFC. Since we are reporting decreased cortical thickness variability in DS, we would like to assess whether or not this finding is associated with regional cortical dysfunction. Direct evidence that decreased variation of regional cortical thickness is associated with regional cortical malfunction has not been reported. In our previous work using neurotypical controls, as the age increased from toddlers to adulthood, the SD of the left rostral MFC thickness decreased from 0.86 to 0.66 in males and from 0.85 to 0.68 in females.10 Our results showed that DS patients had decreased regional variation (SD) of cortical thicknesses when compared to NC. Although in typical development, decreased regional variation of cortical thickness with age may be related to normal brain maturation involving cortical folding, myelination, neural remodeling, and synaptic pruning,22 it is unlikely that these maturation processes are accelerated in DS.3 In our study decreased SD of thicknesses of the right rostral ACC, right STC, and left MFC were observed in DS, which may be related to a decreased degree of neuronal migration and myelination in the cortex of those regions.4 The ACC is a part of the limbic system. The dorsal part of the ACC is related to visual cognition and emotion such as anxiety.23 The STC includes auditory association areas, and plays a crucial role in the processing of auditory and visual speech information,24 and internal timing when communicating with others.25 The MFC plays a role in the down-regulation of emotional responses,26 reorienting of attention,27 and hand writing symbolic codes such as letters and words.28 The regional cortical changes observed in this study potentially contribute to intellectual dysfunction in DS found in the literature.
An additional perspective is that regional cortical changes might be secondary to cerebellar volume loss. The volumes of the bilateral cerebellar GM in DS were already abnormally decreased at birth (Fig. 1) and continued to be significantly reduced compared to NC throughout the studied age period. The volumes of the right ACC and the right STC initially had similar values in DS and NC, with group-wise differences gradually increasing and demonstrating statistically significantly reduced volumes in DS in later developmental stages. Recent functional MRI studies revealed cortico-cerebellar functional networks of the ACC and STC with the cerebellum.29–31 The hypoactivities in these cortico-cerebellar pathways due to the small cerebellum might contribute to decreased volume of the ACC and STC as secondary effects.
Limitations
In the current study, we did not include the assessment of neurocognitive functions in DS. Therefore, it is difficult to directly connect the findings in structural MRIs with cognitive dysfunction in DS. Some researchers have looked at potential pathways to connect structural differences and various neuroanatomic features with characteristic neurocognitive profiles in DS.32–34 Although some patterns emerge as a population, prediction of individual neurocognitive outcomes based on neuroimaging is not currently possible. Therefore, further research is needed in this area.
Furthermore, in this study, rates of comorbidities such as congenital cardiac disease and infantile spasms were higher than in prior prospective studies. The possible presence of selection bias (healthcare access bias) could not be excluded, because our study is retrospective and performed at a single medical facility. In addition, as a common issue among DS studies, our control population did not have comorbidities associated with DS. In the future, it would be important to use data from patients with such comorbidities without DS diagnoses (e.g. congenital cardiac disorders) in order to control for these comorbidities in DS.
An additional limitation of this study is that FreeSurfer12 is not optimized for the youngest participants. As such, the rate at which FreeSurfer fails to extract measurements from clinical MRI examinations increases substantially for participants aged 0 to 8 months and the reliability of the results successfully produced by FreeSurfer on participants from this age range is not certain. FreeSurfer’s reliability was assessed as reasonable for participants 8-months-old and later,10,35 at which point myelination contrast patterns have inverted so as to match the general pattern exhibited through the rest of life. Research aimed at overcoming the problem of FreeSurfer’s applicability and reliability in very young populations is ongoing36 and developments in this venue will be incorporated into future work.
5. CONCLUSION
We analyzed structural MRI in infants and toddlers with DS, and found that cerebellar GM volumes and brainstem volume were reduced in infants with DS relative to NC, an effect that was independent of patient comorbidities. These results suggest that cerebellar GM and the brainstem might be the regions primarily affected by an extra copy of chromosome 21 during early brain development.
Highlights.
A surface-based MRI analysis was carried out in infants and toddlers with DS.
The effect of comorbid status in an early years DS population was assessed.
The cerebellar gray matter is smaller in DS independently of comorbid effects.
Regionally reduced variability of cortical thickness was observed in DS.
ACKNOWLEDEMENTS
We thank Harrison Dieuveuil, Patrick MacDonald and Ashley Ruyan Lim at Boston Children’s Hospital for technical support. This research project was supported by NIH R01HD078561, R21HD098606, R21MH118739, R03NS101372 to E.T., and Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada’s Canada Research Chair grant (231266), a Canada Foundation for Innovation and Nova Scotia Research and Innovation Trust infrastructure grant (R0176004), and a St. Francis Xavier University research startup grant (R0168020) to J.L.
Study Funding
This research project was supported by NIH R01HD078561, R21HD098606, R21MH118739, R03NS101372 to E.T, and Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada’s Canada Research Chair grant (231266), a Canada Foundation for Innovation and Nova Scotia Research and Innovation Trust infrastructure grant (R0176004), and a St. Francis Xavier University research startup grant (R0168020) to J.L
Abbreviations
- DS
Down syndrome
- NC
Neurotypical controls
- MRI
magnetic resonance imaging
- YO
years old
- SD
standard deviation
- GM
gray matter
- WM
white matter
- GI
gyrification index
- GLM
General Linear Model
- ACC
anterior cingulate cortex
- STC
superior temporal cortex
- MFC
middle frontal cortex
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict of Interest
T.S., J. L., N.B. and E. T. declare relevant no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
References
- 1.Hamner T, Udhnani MD, Osipowicz KZ, Lee NR. Pediatric Brain Development in Down Syndrome: A Field in Its Infancy. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2018; 24:966–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bull MJ; Committee on Genetics. Health supervision for children with Down syndrome. Pediatrics 2011; 128:393–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Haydar TF, Reeves RH. Trisomy 21 and early brain development. Trends Neurosci 2012; 35:81–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Golden JA, Hyman BT. Development of the superior temporal neocortex is anomalous in trisomy 21. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1994; 53:513–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Whittle N, Sartori SB, Dierssen M, Lubec G, Singewald N. Fetal Down syndrome brains exhibit aberrant levels of neurotransmitters critical for normal brain development. Pediatrics 2007; 120:e1465–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ortinau C, Inder T, Lambeth J, Wallendorf M, Finucane K, Beca J. Congenital heart disease affects cerebral size but not brain growth. Pediatr Cardiol 2012; 33:1138–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harini C, Sharda S, Bergin AM, et al. Detailed Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Analysis in Infantile Spasms. J Child Neurol 2018; 33:405–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Clairman H, Skocic J, Lischinsky JE, Rovet J. Do children with congenital hypothyroidism exhibit abnormal cortical morphology? Pediatr Res 2015; 78:286–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Neale N, Padilla C, Fonseca LM, Holland T, Zaman S. Neuroimaging and other modalities to assess Alzheimer’s disease in Down syndrome. Neuroimage Clin 2017; 17:263–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Levman J, MacDonald P, Lim AR, Forgeron C, Takahashi E. A pediatric structural MRI analysis of healthy brain development from newborns to young adults. Hum Brain Mapp 2017; 38:5931–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pienaar R, Rannou N, Bernal J, Hahn D, Grant PE. ChRIS--A web-based neuroimaging and informatics system for collecting, organizing, processing, visualizing and sharing of medical data. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015; 2015:206–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fischl B FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 2012; 62:774–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gunbey HP, Bilgici MC, Aslan K, et al. Structural brain alterations of Down’s syndrome in early childhood evaluation by DTI and volumetric analyses. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:3013–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fujii Y, Aida N, Niwa T, Enokizono M, Nozawa K, Inoue T. A small pons as a characteristic finding in Down syndrome: A quantitative MRI study. Brain Dev 2017; 39:298–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kates WR, Folley BS, Lanham DC, Capone GT, Kaufmann WE. Cerebral growth in Fragile X syndrome: review and comparison with Down syndrome. Microsc Res Tech 2002; 57:159–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Smigielska-Kuzia J, Boćkowski L, Sobaniec W, et al. A volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study of brain structures in children with Down syndrome. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2011; 45:363–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kaufmann WE, Cooper KL, Mostofsky SH, et al. Specificity of cerebellar vermian abnormalities in autism: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. J Child Neurol 2003; 18:463–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Carter JC, Capone GT, Kaufmann WE. Neuroanatomic correlates of autism and stereotypy in children with Down syndrome. Neuroreport 2008; 19:653–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Carducci F, Onorati P, Condoluci C, et al. Whole-brain voxel-based morphometry study of children and adolescents with Down syndrome. Funct Neurol 2013; 28:19–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pinter JD, Eliez S, Schmitt JE, Capone GT, Reiss AL. Neuroanatomy of Down’s syndrome: a high-resolution MRI study. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158:1659–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Raz N, Torres IJ, Briggs SD, et al. Selective neuroanatomic abnormalities in Down’s syndrome and their cognitive correlates: evidence from MRI morphometry. Neurology 1995;45:356–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.de Graaf-Peters VB, Hadders-Algra M. Ontogeny of the human central nervous system: what is happening when? Early Hum Dev 2006; 82:257–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shinoura N, Yamada R, Tabei Y, Shiode T, Itoi C, Saito S, Midorikawa A. The right dorsal anterior cingulate cortex may play a role in anxiety disorder and visual function. Neurol Res 2013; 35:65–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Anderson CA, Lazard DS, Hartley DE. Plasticity in bilateral superior temporal cortex: Effects of deafness and cochlear implantation on auditory and visual speech processing. Hear Res 2017; 343:138–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schirmer A, Meck WH, Penney TB. The Socio-Temporal Brain: Connecting People in Time. Trends Cogn Sci 2016; 20:760–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Blair KS, Smith BW, Mitchell DG, et al. Modulation of emotion by cognition and cognition by emotion. Neuroimage 2007; 35:430–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Japee S, Holiday K, Satyshur MD, Mukai I, Ungerleider LG. A role of right middle frontal gyrus in reorienting of attention: a case study. Front Syst Neurosci 2015; 9:23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Klein E, Willmes K, Jung S, Huber S, Braga LW, Moeller K. Differing Connectivity of Exner’s Area for Numbers and Letters. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10:281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hoffstaedter F, Grefkes C, Caspers S, et al. The role of anterior midcingulate cortex in cognitive motor control: evidence from functional connectivity analyses. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35:2741–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pastor MA, Vidaurre C, Fernández-Seara MA, Villanueva A, Friston KJ. Frequency-specific coupling in the cortico-cerebellar auditory system. J Neurophysiol 2008; 100:1699–705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Quintero A, Ichesco E, Schutt R, Myers C, Peltier S, Gerstner GE. Functional connectivity of human chewing: an fcMRI study. J Dent Res 2013; 92:272–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Edgin JO. Cognition in Down syndrome: a developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 2013;4:307–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Anderson JS, Nielsen JA, Ferguson MA, et al. Abnormal brain synchrony in Down Syndrome. Neuroimage Clin 2013;2:703–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fidler DJ, Nadel L. Education and children with Down syndrome: neuroscience, development, and intervention. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2007;13:262–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Levman J, Vasung L, MacDonald P, et al. Regional volumetric abnormalities in pediatric autism revealed by structural magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Dev Neurosci 2018;71:34–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.de Macedo Rodrigues K, Ben-Avi E, Sliva DD, et al. A FreeSurfer-compliant consistent manual segmentation of infant brains spanning the 0–2 year age range. Front Hum Neurosci 2015;9:21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]