Table 4.
≥ 1 falls (any falls) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test | AUC (95% CI) | Cutoff Score | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | LR+ (95% CI) | LR− (95% CI) |
NBWT (/1.00) | .81 (.62–.91) | ≤ 0.43 | 73% (53%–90%) | 76% (54%–96%) | 3.0 (1.5–6.9) | .36 (.19–.77) |
TUG (sec) | .71 (.54–.88) | ≥ 8.17 | 83% (68%–98%) | 68% (46%–92%) | 2.6 (1.3–5.6) | .24 (.13–.56) |
FSST (sec) | .70 (.53–.86) | ≥ 8.49 | 74% (58%–92%) | 68% (46%–92%) | 2.4 (1.1–5.2) | .36 (.17–.78) |
BBS (/56) | .66 (.47–.83) | ≤ 50.5 | 67% (48%–86%) | 62% (39%–86%) | 1.8 (.89–3.6) | .53 (.27–1.1) |
ABC (/100) | .65 (.47–.82) | ≤ 80.2 | 50% (30%–70%) | 74% (54%–96%) | 1.9 (.78–5.1) | .67 (.41–1.1) |
Model 1 | .84 (.71–.96) | N/A | 80% (64%−96%) | 73% (51%–96%) | 3.0 (1.3–7.1) | .27 (.12–.63) |
≥ 2 falls (multiple falls) | ||||||
Test | AUC (95% CI) | Cutoff Score | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | LR+ (95% CI) | LR− (95% CI) |
NBWT (/1.00) | .89 (.78–1.0) | ≤ 0.43 | 88% (73%–100%) | 79% (65%–92%) | 4.2 (1.7–6.9) | .16 (.042–.60) |
TUG (sec) | .88 (.78–.98) | ≥ 9.25 | 82% (64%–100%) | 83% (67%–98%) | 4.7 (1.9–11.9) | .21 (.075–.61) |
FSST (sec) | .88 (.76–.99) | ≥ 8.71 | 94% (83%–100%) | 74% (60%–92%) | 3.6 (1.8–7.3) | .08 (.012–.54) |
BBS (/56) | .81 (.66–.92) | ≤ 50.5 | 88% (73%–100%) | 70% (51%–88%) | 2.9 (1.5–5.5) | .17 (.045–.64) |
ABC (/100) | .71 (.54–.87) | ≤ 80.2 | 65% (42%–87%) | 78% (61%–95%) | 3.0 (1.3–7.0) | .45 (.23–.89) |
Model 2 | .90 (.79–1.0) | N/A | 76% (56%–97%) | 83% (67%–98%) | 4.4 (1.7–11.3) | .28 (.12–.68) |
ABC: Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale; AUC: Area Under the Curve; BBS: Berg Balance Scale; CI: Confidence Interval; FSST: Four Square Step test; LR-: negative likelihood ratio; LR+: positive likelihood ratio; NBWT: Narrowing Beam Walking Test; TuG: Timed Up and Go.
Model 1: NBWT; FSST; PLUS-M; amputation level
Model 2: NBWT; TUG; PLUS-M; K-level; amputation etiology