Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: PM R. 2019 May 3;12(1):16–25. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12160

Table 4.

Validity indices for performance-based clinical balance tests among unilateral lower limb prosthesis users for two faller classifications

≥ 1 falls (any falls)
Test AUC (95% CI) Cutoff Score Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) LR+ (95% CI) LR− (95% CI)
NBWT (/1.00) .81 (.62–.91) ≤ 0.43 73% (53%–90%) 76% (54%–96%) 3.0 (1.5–6.9) .36 (.19–.77)
TUG (sec) .71 (.54–.88) ≥ 8.17 83% (68%–98%) 68% (46%–92%) 2.6 (1.3–5.6) .24 (.13–.56)
FSST (sec) .70 (.53–.86) ≥ 8.49 74% (58%–92%) 68% (46%–92%) 2.4 (1.1–5.2) .36 (.17–.78)
BBS (/56) .66 (.47–.83) ≤ 50.5 67% (48%–86%) 62% (39%–86%) 1.8 (.89–3.6) .53 (.27–1.1)
ABC (/100) .65 (.47–.82) ≤ 80.2 50% (30%–70%) 74% (54%–96%) 1.9 (.78–5.1) .67 (.41–1.1)
Model 1 .84 (.71–.96) N/A 80% (64%−96%) 73% (51%–96%) 3.0 (1.3–7.1) .27 (.12–.63)

≥ 2 falls (multiple falls)
Test AUC (95% CI) Cutoff Score Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) LR+ (95% CI) LR− (95% CI)

NBWT (/1.00) .89 (.78–1.0) ≤ 0.43 88% (73%–100%) 79% (65%–92%) 4.2 (1.7–6.9) .16 (.042–.60)
TUG (sec) .88 (.78–.98) ≥ 9.25 82% (64%–100%) 83% (67%–98%) 4.7 (1.9–11.9) .21 (.075–.61)
FSST (sec) .88 (.76–.99) ≥ 8.71 94% (83%–100%) 74% (60%–92%) 3.6 (1.8–7.3) .08 (.012–.54)
BBS (/56) .81 (.66–.92) ≤ 50.5 88% (73%–100%) 70% (51%–88%) 2.9 (1.5–5.5) .17 (.045–.64)
ABC (/100) .71 (.54–.87) ≤ 80.2 65% (42%–87%) 78% (61%–95%) 3.0 (1.3–7.0) .45 (.23–.89)
Model 2 .90 (.79–1.0) N/A 76% (56%–97%) 83% (67%–98%) 4.4 (1.7–11.3) .28 (.12–.68)

ABC: Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale; AUC: Area Under the Curve; BBS: Berg Balance Scale; CI: Confidence Interval; FSST: Four Square Step test; LR-: negative likelihood ratio; LR+: positive likelihood ratio; NBWT: Narrowing Beam Walking Test; TuG: Timed Up and Go.

Model 1: NBWT; FSST; PLUS-M; amputation level

Model 2: NBWT; TUG; PLUS-M; K-level; amputation etiology