Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Jul 11;66(6):589–600. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.06.003

Table 3.

Percentage of patients for each condition that was an occult injury and proportions who had interventions of mechanical ventilation, chest tube (both major interventions), and inpatient pain control or observation greater than 24 hours (minor intervention), with ORs for each injury comparing intervention for conditions found on chest CT only versus those found on chest radiography and chest CT.*

Imaging That Identified Injury,
No. (%)
OR (95% CI) for
Intervention for Injury
Observed on CCT
Only vs CXR and CCT
Injury Type Total Injured, No. (%) CXR and CCT CCT Only OI, %

Pulmonary contusion 682 168 514 75.4
 Mechanical ventilation, major 51 (7.5) 20 (11.9) 31 (6.0) 60.8 0.41 (0.22–0.80)
 Pain control/observation >24 h, minor 148 (21.7) 46 (27.4) 102 (19.8) 68.9 0.59 (0.39–0.92)
 No intervention 483 (70.8) 102 (60.7) 381 (74.1) 78.9 1.00 [Reference]
Pneumothorax 597 192 405 67.8
 Chest tube, major 234 (39.2) 116 (60.4) 118 (29.1) 50.4 0.33 (0.22–0.48)
 Pain control/observation >24 h, minor 95 (15.9) 11 (5.7) 84 (20.7) 88.4 2.45 (1.20–5.39)
 No intervention 268 (44.9) 65 (33.8) 203 (50.1) 75.7 1.00 [Reference]
Hemothorax 230 46 184 80.0
 Chest tube, major 101 (43.9) 26 (56.5) 75 (40.8) 74.3 0.65 (0.31–1.34)
 Pain control/observation >24 h, minor 26 (11.3) 1 (2.2) 25 (13.6) 96.1 5.65 (0.81–244.2)
 No intervention 103 (44.8) 19 (41.3) 84 (45.7) 81.6 1.00 [Reference]
*

If a patient had both pneumothorax and hemothorax and received a chest tube, this was counted as a major intervention for both pneumothorax and hemothorax.