Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Jul 11;66(6):589–600. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.06.003

Table 4.

Percentage of patients with all significant intrathoracic injuries, classified as major or minor, and the percentage who had major (surgery, chest tube, or mechanical ventilation) or minor (inpatient pain control or observation >24 hours) interventions.*

Imaging That Identified Injury
ORs (95% CI) of Intervention
for Injury on CCT Only vs
CXR and CCT
Injury Classification Total Injured CXR and CCT CCT Only OI, %

Patients with any injury 2,048 594 1,454 71.0 N/A
 Any major SITI   305 103    202 66.2 0.23 (0.17–0.33)
 Minor SITI only   396   53    343 86.6 0.78 (0.54–1.12)
 Thoracic injury without clinical significance only 1,018 109    909 89.3 1.00 [Reference]
Patients with suspected injury on CXR not confirmed on CCT 329 (false-positive CXR) 329 (false-positive CXR) 0 (presuming CCT is criterion reference) 0
Percentage of all patients (n=5,912) N/A N/A 1,454 24.6

N/A, Not applicable; SITI, significant intrathoracic injury, whether major or minor, all of which had some intervention.

*

SITI is defined as receiving some intervention.

2,048=Total patients with suspicion of injury on CXR (eg, widened mediastinum) whether confirmed on CCT or not, plus actual injuries identified on CCT.