Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 23;2019(9):CD013435. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013435

Comparison 1. Beta‐blocker vs control for cardiac surgery.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 All‐cause mortality (30 days) 29 4099 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.95 [0.47, 1.90]
2 Long‐term mortality 3 511 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.29, 2.79]
3 Death due to cardiac causes 4 320 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.84 [0.14, 5.19]
4 Acute myocardial infarction 25 3946 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.72, 1.52]
5 Cerebrovascular events 5 1471 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.37 [0.51, 3.67]
6 Ventricular arrhythmias 12 2296 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.40 [0.25, 0.63]
7 Atrial fibrillation or flutter, or both 40 5650 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.50 [0.42, 0.59]
8 Bradycardia 12 1640 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.63 [0.92, 2.91]
9 Hypotension 10 1538 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.84 [0.89, 3.80]
10 Congestive heart failure 3 311 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.22 [0.04, 1.36]
11 Length of hospital stay (in days) 14 2450 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.54 [‐0.90, ‐0.19]