Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 23;2019(9):CD013435. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013435

Silverman 1982.

Methods Quasi‐randomized trial, parallel design
Participants Total number of randomized participants: 100
Inclusion criteria: scheduled for CABG surgery without additional cardiac surgical procedures
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Type of surgery: elective CABG
Baseline characteristics
Intervention group (propranolol)
  • Age, mean (SD): 55.2 (± 1.7) years

  • Gender, M/F: 48/2

  • History of MI, %: 56

  • History of hypertension, %: 44

  • Preoperative use of beta‐blockers, %: 100


Control group (standard care)
  • Age, mean (SD): 58.2 (± 1.5) years

  • Gender, M/F: 45/5

  • History of MI, %: 64

  • History of hypertension, %: 54

  • Preoperative use of beta‐blockers, %: 100


Country: USA
Setting: single centre; hospital
Interventions Intervention group (propranolol)
  • Randomized, n = 50; losses = 0; analysed, n = 50 (use of ITT analysis was not reported)

  • Details: existing dose of propranolol tapered the day before surgery or maintained at current dose if participant had previously unstable angina or significant left main stenosis. 10 mg orally or via nasogastric tube started on 1st postoperative day, continued until discharge


Control group (standard care)
  • Randomized, n = 50; losses = 0; analysed, n = 50 (use of ITT analysis was not reported)

  • Details: no additional agent

Outcomes Outcomes measured/reported by study authors: supraventricular arrhythmias (to include AF and atrial flutter); perioperative MI, bradycardia or bronchospasm (necessitating discontinuation of study medication)
Outcomes relevant to the review: AF and atrial flutter; perioperative MI; bradycardia and bronchospasm (see notes below)
Notes Funding/declarations of interest: not reported
Study dates: not reported
Note:
  • study authors reported that no participants developed bradycardia or bronchospasm sufficient to discontinue medication. We did not include these data in analysis because we could not be certain whether the outcome was measured only in the intervention group

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Quote: "Randomization was by birthdate"
Comment: quasi‐randomization
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk See above
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open‐label trial
Blinding of outcome assessors (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open‐label trial
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No apparent losses
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Study authors did not report prospective clinical trial registration or publication of a protocol. It was not feasible to effectively assess risk of reporting bias
Other bias High risk Either group were given digoxin and propranolol to control supraventricular tachycardias ‐ this affected 6 participants in the control group and 5 participants in the intervention group. This may influence outcome data