TABLE 4.
Best-fit models for each of the three student outcomes with continuous outcomes (beta regressions)a
| Model name | Variable | Estimate | SE | p value | AICc difference | AICc weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Course percentage per student (n = 802) | ||||||
| F1 | Semester: Spring | −0.151 | 0.052 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.553 |
| Semester: Summer | 0.196 | 0.067 | 0.003 | |||
| F2 | Class size category | −0.071 | 0.057 | 0.211 | 0.500 | 0.431 |
| Semester: Spring | −0.143 | 0.052 | 0.006 | |||
| Semester: Summer | 0.145 | 0.077 | 0.059 | |||
| G1 | Class size category | −0.094 | 0.062 | 0.131 | 0.000 | 0.474 |
| Semester: Spring | −0.116 | 0.054 | 0.030 | |||
| Semester: Summer | 0.193 | 0.082 | 0.019 | |||
| G2 | Semester: Spring | −0.127 | 0.053 | 0.017 | 0.300 | 0.415 |
| Semester: Summer | 0.257 | 0.071 | 0.000 | |||
| G1 | Class size category | −0.094 | 0.062 | 0.131 | 0.000 | 0.474 |
aFor each outcome, all uni- and multivariable models that are <2 of the lowest AICc are shown.