Table 2.
Summary of linear mixed effects regression models and Pearson correlations on forearm and forehead
Location | Relationship | (95 CI) | (95 CI) | IQR of (data/fit − 1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forearm | 0.62 | * | |||
0.61 | * | ||||
0.08 (0.01, 0.15) | 0.64 | 0.66* | |||
0.83 (0.72, 0.94) | 1.08 | * | |||
0.78 (0.67, 0.89) | 0.77 | * | |||
0.46 | 0.56* | ||||
Forehead | 0.99 | * | |||
0.66 | * | ||||
0.21 (0.16,0.27) | 0.58 | ||||
0.97 (0.88,1.05) | 0.79 | * | |||
1.04 (0.93, 1.14) | 0.26 | * | |||
1.31 (1.06,1.57) | 0.59 | 0.01 |
Note: , mean blood flow index; PI, blood flow pulsatility index;; ; , probe pressure; subscript “o” indicates initial baseline probe pressure; subscripts “2.1” and “3.1” refer to data acquired at 2.1- and 3.1-cm source-detector separations (PI only computed at 2.1 cm); IQR is interquartile range of the fractional difference (measured data)/(estimate from best-fit line) − 1; is Pearson’s correlation. *; for other two comparisons.