Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 14;18(4):2843–2850. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7897

Table I.

Baseline characteristics of the studies included.

A, ESWT vs. placebo

First author, year OA joints included Size of intervention group (ESWT), n Size of control group (placebo), n Outcomes Follow-up (Refs.)
Chen et al, 2014 Bilateral knees 30 30 1. ROM After 8 weeks (physical and placebo) (18)
2. VAS (after walking or standing 5 min) After 6 weeks (ESWT)
3. Li
Cho et al, 2016 Bilateral knees or unilateral knees   9   9 After 1 week (19)
Elerian et al, 2016 Bilateral knees 20 20 VAS WOMAC (20)
ROM After 8 weeks
Imamura et al, 2017 Bilateral knees 52 53 VAS After 12 weeks (15)
WOMAC
Zhao et al, 2013 Unilateral OA or more painful side 30 31 1. VAS After 4 weeks and 12 weeks (21)
2. LI
3. WOMAC

B, ESWT vs. physical therapy

First author, year OA joints included Size of intervention group (ESWT), n Size of control group (placebo), n Outcomes Follow-up (Refs.)

Chen et al, 2014 Bilateral knees 30 30 1. ROM After 8 weeks (physical and placebo) (18)
2. VAS After 6 weeks (ESWT)
3. LI
Lee et al, 2017 Bilateral knees 10 10 1. VAS After 4 weeks (22)
2. WOMAC
Lizis et al, 2017 Unilateral knee 20 20 ROM After 5 weeks (23)
WOMAC

OA, osteoarthritis; ESWT, extracorporeal shockwave therapy; ROM, range of motion; VAS, visual analogue scale; LI, Lequesne index; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index.