Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 14;18(4):2993–3001. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7896

Table III.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic variables for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Overall survival Disease-free survival


Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Variable P-value HR (95% CI) P-value P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Sex 1.528 0.699
  Male vs. female 0.598 (0.670–3.484) 0.313 0.999 (0.303–1.613) 0.402
Age 0.559 0.941
  <60 vs. ≥60 0.030a (0.318–0.981) 0.043a 0.585 (0.533–1.662) 0.835
Smoking 0.931 0.639
  Yes vs. no 0.921 (0.469–1.847) 0.838 0.212 (0.335–1.218) 0.174
Drinking 1.910 0.951
  Yes vs. no 0.282 (0.957–3.812) 0.067 0.762 (0.488–1.851) 0.882
T stage 0.872 0.785
  T1-2 vs. T3 −4 0.445 (0.466–1.631) 0.668 0.452 (0.422–1.458) 0.443
N stage 1.530 1.035
  N0 vs. N1-3 <0.001a (0.533–4.395) 0.430 0.001a (0.365–2,937) 0.948
Differentiation 0.783 0.885
  Well vs. moderate vs. poor 0.658 (0.526–1.165) 0.227 0.915 (0.595–1.316) 0.545
pTNM 1.805 3.108
  I–II vs. III <0.001a (0.608–5.357) 0.287 <0.001a (1.038–9.310) 0.043a
YAP expression 2.727 2.161
  Low vs. over 0.001a (1.556–4.780) <0.001a 0.005a (1.223–3.818) 0.008a
CRT 0.974 0.907
  None vs. RT vs. 0.785 (0.768–1.237) 0.831 0.620 (0.708–1.163) 0.443
CT vs. RT+CT
a

P<0.05. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; RT, radiotherapy; CT, chemotherapy; CRT, Radiochemotherapy; T stage, invasion depth; N stage, lymph node metastasis; pTNM, pathological TNM.