TABLE 3.
MICT (n=15) | HIIT (n=15) | ANCOVA | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change | p-value | Baseline | Change | p-value | p-value | |
Rate-Your-Plate scores | 56±6 | 2±5 | P=.19 | 52±6 | 8±5 | P<.001 | P=.02 |
Statin therapy intensity | 2.1±1.3 | 0.3±0.7 | P=.16 | 2.8±0.6 | −0.1±0.3 | P=.33 | P=.46 |
Anthropometric measurements | |||||||
Body weight, kg | 86.4±12.3 | −0.3±3.7 | P=.55 | 86.4±18.2 | −0.6±1.9 | P=.43 | P=.74 |
BMI, kg/m2 | 30.5±4.2 | −0.6±1.8 | P=.25 | 30.2±4.8 | 0.0±1.4 | P=.99 | P=.33 |
Body fat, % | 39.0±6.0 | 0.1±1.9 | P=.89 | 38.9±6.1 | −1.9±2.0 | P=.003 | P=.01 |
Fat mass, kg | 32.6±7.3 | −0.1±1.6 | P=.83 | 32.7±9.2 | −1.7±1.9 | P=.003 | P=.02 |
Lean mass, kg | 50.6±7.9 | −0.2±3.0 | P=.82 | 51.0±10.7 | 1.1±1.6 | P=.02 | P=.15 |
Abdominal fat, % | 45.5±6.9 | 0.4±3.1 | P=.62 | 47.5±8.1 | −2.6±3.3 | P=.008 | P=.02 |
Waist circum., cm | 106±10 | −0±5 | P=.80 | 108±17 | −2±5 | P=.13 | P=.36 |
Hip circum., cm | 107±7.4 | −1±4 | P=.63 | 106±9 | −0±10 | P=.87 | P=.97 |
W/H ratio | 1.0±0.1 | 0.0±0.1 | P=.71 | 1.0±0.1 | −0.0±0.1 | P=.61 | P=.66 |
Lipid profile | |||||||
TC, mg/dl | 166.4±37.7 | 0.9±47.6 | P=.96 | 174.7±40.1 | −38.9±39.5 | P=.006 | P=.04 |
HDL-c, mg/dl | 44.1±5.5 | 3.0±8.5 | P=.39 | 51.3±16.6 | 0.2±10.2 | P=.96 | P=.81 |
LDL-c, mg/dl | 89.4±27.8 | −5.3±35.3 | P=.71 | 97.2±34.7 | −38.1±35.3 | P=.005 | P=.04 |
Triglycerides, mg/dl | 187.7±97.5 | −7.6±53.2 | P=.72 | 158.3±104.4 | −28.8±60.0 | P=.13 | P=.08 |
Non-HDL-c, mg/dl | 122.3±35.9 | −2.1±48.0 | P=.91 | 123.3±38.6 | −39.1±42.2 | P=.008 | P=.03 |
HDL-c = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; W/H = waist/hip circumference; TC = total cholesterol.
Values are reported as Mean ± Standard deviation or number and percent population (%). The changes within group from baseline to the completion of 36 sessions of cardiac rehabilitation are assessed with paired t-test, and the difference of changes across groups was analyzed by ANCOVA.