Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 23;8(17):e013332. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013332

Table 5.

Baseline Characteristics, Procedural and 30‐Day Results, and Midterm Outcomes Comparing the TMVR Cohort With the COAPT Device Group

TMVR (N=308) COAPT Device Group (N=302)
Characteristics of the patients at baseline
Age, y 75.2±3.5 72.2±11.2
STS‐PROM score, % 7.7±0.75 7.8±5.5
Secondary MR 217/280 (77.5) 302/302 (100)
Grade III or IV MR severity 211/213 (99.1) 302/302 (100)
Left ventricular ejection fraction 42.4±4.7 31.3±9.3
Hypertension 102/123 (82.9) 243/302 (80.5)
Diabetes mellitus 70/190 (36.8) 106/302 (35.1)
Prior myocardial infarction 89/177 (50.3) 156/302 (51.7)
Prior coronary artery bypass surgery 111/251 (44.2) 121/302 (40.1)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 95/249 (38.2) 71/302 (23.5)
Hospitalization for HF within past year 77/163 (47.2) 176/302 (58.3)
Procedural and 30‐d clinical outcomes
Procedure time, min 121.4±41.9 162.9±118.1
All‐cause 30‐d mortality 40/295 (13.6) 7/302 (2.3)
Stroke 7/242 (2.9) 2/302 (0.7)
Moderate or severe MR 4/273 (1.5) 20/273 (7.3)
Unplanned mitral valve surgery 11/272 (4.0) 0/302 (0.0)
Midterm clinical outcomesa
Any mortality during follow‐up 71/257 (27.6) 57/302 (18.9)
NYHA class III–IV 21/146 (14.4) 48/237 (20.3)
Moderate or severe MR 0/83 (0.0) 11/210 (5.2)
HF hospitalization 46/174 (26.4) 92/302 (35.7)
Unplanned mitral valve reintervention 4/174 (2.3) 10/302 (3.3)b
Device embolization or migration 2/254 (0.8) 1/293 (0.3)
Endocarditis 4/150 (2.7) 0/293 (0.0)

Values are mean±SD or n/N (%). COAPT indicates Clinical Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy; HF, heart failure; MR, mitral regurgitation; NYHA, New York Heart Association; STS‐PROM, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality; TMVR, transcatheter mitral valve replacement.

a

Midterm follow‐up for TMVR cohort and COAPT device group were 10.1 and 12 mo, respectively.

b

Unplanned mitral valve intervention within 24 mo.