TABLE 3.
Category | Definition and examples |
---|---|
Low preparation and interest | Students do not have an interest in the concept/course or do not have adequate preparation for the course. |
High workload | Course requires a lot of time, especially out of class (especially with other people), assignments, reading, and information. |
Quick pace | Course has too much content covered too quickly for a student to process. |
Unclear importance | Students struggle with determining what is important; there are lots of facts to be memorized; facts don’t seem to “fit” anywhere to students. Disorganized course structure makes it hard for students to follow. |
Lack of alignment | Assessments do not match content or approach in the class. Most of the grade depends on one or two assessments. |
Low faculty support | Faculty do not appear to help and support students; lots of learning being done on their own (independent learning); lack of active-learning approaches; students receive little feedback on assessments for improvement. |
High cognitive demanda | Material/content is more complex and requires critical thinking, application, analysis, synthesis, and/or evaluation. |
aIf students specifically mentioned a hard assignment and referenced cognitive demand (e.g., critical thinking), then we coded the response as “HCD” (high cognitive demand); if not, then we did not code that mentioning, as we could not tell what was “difficult” or “hard” about the assignment or what “hard” meant in this context.