Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 23.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2019 Aug 16;141(34):13421–13433. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b04387

Figure 4. — (A) Comparison of the calculated “hybrid” (●) and experimental liposome P_m values (orange ■).^88–89 The red solid line is the best fit of the “hybrid” P_m to eq. 2. The brown solid line was predicted from eq. 1. (B) Reassessment of the experimental PAMPA P_m values .¹¹⁰ The solid red line is the best fit to eq. S10. The dashed lines refer to the $P_{m}^{e}$ corrected for the aqueous boundary layer (brown based on eq. 1 and red based on eq. 2, check the Supporting Information section 3.2 for details).

Inline graphic — (A) Comparison of the calculated “hybrid” (●) and experimental liposome P_m values (orange ■).^88–89 The red solid line is the best fit of the “hybrid” P_m to eq. 2. The brown solid line was predicted from eq. 1. (B) Reassessment of the experimental PAMPA P_m values .¹¹⁰ The solid red line is the best fit to eq. S10. The dashed lines refer to the $P_{m}^{e}$ corrected for the aqueous boundary layer (brown based on eq. 1 and red based on eq. 2, check the Supporting Information section 3.2 for details).