Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e028465. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028465

Table 5.

Risk factors that increase the risk of occupational violence 4 18–22 30 33 52 54 56 60 68–71

Workplace design
  • Poor delineation between staff-only area and patient area

  • Lack of controls in accessing staff-only and patient areas

  • Overcrowded, uncomfortable or noisy waiting rooms

  • Poor access to exits, toilets and amenities

  • Poor lighting, blind spots without surveillance

  • Unsecured furnishings that can be used as weapons

Policies and work practices
  • Increased waiting times

  • Poor customer services from staff

  • Deficit in staffing levels or inadequate skills mix

  • Working alone

  • Lack of violence-prevention programmes

  • Lack of staff empowerment and shared governance

  • Lack of follow-up of violent episodes by management

  • Poor safety culture: ‘broken window principle’

  • Ineffective mechanisms to warn and ultimately deny service to patients with repeated behaviours of concern

  • Lack of staff training in de-escalation techniques

  • Lack of staff training in aetiology and treatment of various pathologies associated with violent behaviour

  • Use of physical restraints

  • Mismatch between expectations and services offered: for example, demands for classified drugs

  • Presence of drugs, cash or valuable items in the office

  • Presence of weapons

  • Refusal to provide a prescription or a sickness or disability certificate

  • On-call shifts/house visits

Patient factors
  • Current illness with physiological imbalances or disturbances:

    • Head trauma

    • Encephalitis, meningitis, infection

    • Encephalopathy

    • Metabolic derangement: Hyponatraemia, hypocalcaemia, hypoglycaemia

    • Hypoxia

    • Thyroid disease

    • Seizure (postictal)

    • Exposure to environmental toxins

    • Toxic levels of medications

  • Active intoxication, substance dependence, misuse or abuse

  • Psychosocial stressors

  • Previous poor experiences with healthcare services

  • Past history of violence

  • Psychiatric disorder

  • Personality, interpersonal style of control or dominance

  • Frustration, perception not being respected, not being listened to or being treated unfairly

  • Stress, agitation

  • Loss of situational control

  • Unexpected or high costs of healthcare

  • Complex family relationships

Physicians factors
  • Being unprepared

  • Lack of education and training on violence: being unaware of own body language, not knowing how to de-escalate, not knowing how to escape

  • Inadequate medical skills

  • Poor communication skills

  • Less years of experience

  • Physicians own emotions, anger, anxiety, countertransference

  • Overworked, stressed

  • Interpersonal style: for example, assertive style by the physician may challenge the patient’s sense of dominance and lead to discomfort and frustration

  • Gender: no difference in overall risk of violence, increased risk within younger, male GPs for physical assaults

  • Vulnerability in being a source of risk with respect to legal or licensing matters, for example, with information to third parties beyond direct patient care

  • Vulnerability : where does the duty of care end in the face of potential violence?

  • Personality traits with increased risk: low agreeableness, high neuroticism, high negative affect, low extroversion, low conscientiousness, low self-esteem

Societal causes/social context
  • Poverty, unemployment and social dislocation

  • Reduced respect for authority, patients are having a greater sense of entitlement than in the past and as a consequence frustration in not getting response to demands potentially leads to violence

  • ‘Bowling for Columbine effect’: spiral of fearfulness, suspicion leading to pre-emptive defensiveness, confrontation and ultimately a greater risk of violence

  • Population density

  • Language barriers

  • Cultural differences

GP, general practitioner.