Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 1;32(3):145–150. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18064

Table 3.

The frequency distribution of the reliability values according to the groups

Reliability questions Researcher Score Orthodontist Orthodontics Orthodontic treatment
Are the aims clear and achieved? GS 0 9 (29) 3 (7.1) 4 (11.4)
1 22 (71) 39 (92.9) 31 (88.6)
DDK 0 10 (32.3) 6 (14.3) 8 (22.9)
1 21 (67.7) 36 (85.7) 27 (77.1)
K value 0.773* 0.632* 0.607*
Reliable sources info? GS 0 10 (32.3) 15 (35.7) 15 (42.9)
1 21 (67.7) 27 (64.3) 20 (57.1)
DDK 0 20 (64.5) 20 (47.6) 24 (68.6)
1 11 (35.5) 22 (52.4) 11 (31.4)
K value 0.415** 0.566** 0.512**
Balanced and unbiased? GS 0 11 (35.5) 23 (54.8) 24 (68.6)
1 20 (64.5) 19 (45.2) 11 (31.4)
DDK 0 20 (64.5) 27 (64.3) 26 (74.3)
1 11 (35.5) 15 (35.7) 9 (25.7)
K value 0.464** 0.510** 0.721*
Additional sources info? GS 0 19 (61.3) 28 (66.7) 28 (80)
1 12 (38.7) 14 (33.3) 7 (20)
DDK 0 22 (73.3) 28 (66.7) 29 (82.9)
1 8 (26.7) 14 (33.3) 6 (17.1)
K value 0.619* 0.571** 0.717*
Are areas of uncertainty mentioned? GS 0 22 (71) 30 (71.4) 29 (82.9)
1 9 (29) 12 (28.6) 6 (17.1)
DDK 0 24 (77.4) 33 (78.6) 32 (91.4)
1 7 (22.6) 9 (21.4) 3 (8.6)
K value 0.665* 0.559** 0.624*

K: kappa coefficent

*

There is good concordance between the researchers.

**

There is moderate concordance between the researchers.